Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>,
	Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
	Srivathsa L Rao <srivathsa.rao@oss.qualcomm.com>,
	Ganapatrao Kulkarni <ganapatrao.kulkarni@oss.qualcomm.com>,
	Trilok Soni <tsoni@quicinc.com>,
	Srinivas Ramana <sramana@qti.qualcomm.com>,
	Niyas Sait <niyas.sait@arm.com>, Lee Trager <lee@trager.us>,
	Ritwick Sharma <ritwick.sharma@arm.com>,
	Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v8 08/11] arm_mpam: prepare mon_sel locking for MPAM-Fb
Date: Tue,  4 Aug 2026 12:06:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260804100627.3217149-9-andre.przywara@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260804100627.3217149-1-andre.przywara@arm.com>

The MSC MON_SEL register needs to be accessed from hardirq for the overflow
interrupt, and when taking an IPI to access these registers on platforms
where MSCs are not accesible from every CPU. This makes an irqsave
spinlock the obvious lock to protect these registers. On systems with
MPAM-Fb mailbox MSC access it must be able to sleep, meaning a mutex must
be used. So MPAM-Fb platforms cannot support an overflow interrupt easily.
Clearly these two methods can't exist for one MSC at the same time.

Change the mon_sel locking wrapper function to only use a spinlock when
the MSC is accessed directly via MMIO. In case of MPAM-Fb, we use a
mutex, but only if we are in a sleepable context. If that's not the
case, we return an error. This should not happen, as MPAM-Fb by design
does not require an MSC access to happen from a specific CPU, so there
is no need for any IPIs or preemption disabling to satisfy CPU
constraints. And since overflow interrupts are not supported at the moment
anyway, we also wouldn't meet the other case.
Bailing out early is already happening in rare occasions today.

Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@oss.qualcomm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> # on NVIDIA Grace Hopper
---
 drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c  |  6 +++++-
 drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
index 49239b15a27f..cda59864808d 100644
--- a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
+++ b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
@@ -2279,7 +2279,6 @@ static struct mpam_msc *do_mpam_msc_drv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (err)
 		return ERR_PTR(err);
 
-	mpam_mon_sel_lock_init(msc);
 	msc->id = pdev->id;
 	msc->pdev = pdev;
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD_RCU(&msc->all_msc_list);
@@ -2300,6 +2299,11 @@ static struct mpam_msc *do_mpam_msc_drv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	else
 		msc->iface = MPAM_IFACE_PCC;
 
+	/* Lock type depends on MSC interface used */
+	err = mpam_mon_sel_lock_init(dev, msc);
+	if (err)
+		return ERR_PTR(err);
+
 	if (msc->iface == MPAM_IFACE_MMIO) {
 		void __iomem *io;
 
diff --git a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h
index 57f2b3dbf7d0..6121cd126510 100644
--- a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h
+++ b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h
@@ -126,6 +126,7 @@ struct mpam_msc {
 	 */
 	raw_spinlock_t		_mon_sel_lock;
 	unsigned long		_mon_sel_flags;
+	struct mutex		mon_sel_mutex;
 
 	void __iomem		*mapped_hwpage;
 	size_t			mapped_hwpage_sz;
@@ -139,27 +140,50 @@ struct mpam_msc {
 /* Returning false here means accesses to mon_sel must fail and report an error. */
 static inline bool __must_check mpam_mon_sel_lock(struct mpam_msc *msc)
 {
-	/* Locking will require updating to support a firmware backed interface */
-	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(msc->iface != MPAM_IFACE_MMIO))
+	if (msc->iface == MPAM_IFACE_MMIO) {
+		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&msc->_mon_sel_lock, msc->_mon_sel_flags);
+
+		return true;
+	}
+
+	if (!preemptible())
 		return false;
 
-	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&msc->_mon_sel_lock, msc->_mon_sel_flags);
+	mutex_lock(&msc->mon_sel_mutex);
+
 	return true;
 }
 
 static inline void mpam_mon_sel_unlock(struct mpam_msc *msc)
 {
-	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&msc->_mon_sel_lock, msc->_mon_sel_flags);
+	if (msc->iface == MPAM_IFACE_MMIO) {
+		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&msc->_mon_sel_lock,
+					   msc->_mon_sel_flags);
+
+		return;
+	}
+
+	mutex_unlock(&msc->mon_sel_mutex);
 }
 
 static inline void mpam_mon_sel_lock_held(struct mpam_msc *msc)
 {
-	lockdep_assert_held_once(&msc->_mon_sel_lock);
+	if (msc->iface == MPAM_IFACE_MMIO)
+		lockdep_assert_held_once(&msc->_mon_sel_lock);
+	else
+		lockdep_assert_held_once(&msc->mon_sel_mutex);
 }
 
-static inline void mpam_mon_sel_lock_init(struct mpam_msc *msc)
+static inline int mpam_mon_sel_lock_init(struct device *dev,
+					 struct mpam_msc *msc)
 {
-	raw_spin_lock_init(&msc->_mon_sel_lock);
+	if (msc->iface == MPAM_IFACE_MMIO) {
+		raw_spin_lock_init(&msc->_mon_sel_lock);
+
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	return devm_mutex_init(dev, &msc->mon_sel_mutex);
 }
 
 DEFINE_GUARD(mon_sel, struct mpam_msc *,
-- 
2.43.0



  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-08-04 10:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-04 10:06 [PATCH v8 00/11] arm_mpam: Add MPAM-Fb firmware support Andre Przywara
2026-08-04 10:06 ` [PATCH v8 01/11] arm_mpam: let low level MSC accessors return an error Andre Przywara
2026-08-04 10:06 ` [PATCH v8 02/11] arm_mpam: propagate MSC access errors for hw_probe functions Andre Przywara
2026-08-04 10:06 ` [PATCH v8 03/11] arm_mpam: propagate MSC access errors for MBWU counters Andre Przywara
2026-08-04 10:06 ` [PATCH v8 04/11] arm_mpam: propagate MSC access errors for msmon helpers Andre Przywara
2026-08-04 10:06 ` [PATCH v8 05/11] arm_mpam: propagate MSC access errors for __ris_msmon_read() Andre Przywara
2026-08-04 10:06 ` [PATCH v8 06/11] arm_mpam: propagate MSC access errors for state saving function Andre Przywara
2026-08-04 10:06 ` [PATCH v8 07/11] arm_mpam: propagate MSC access errors for mpam_reprogram_ris_partid() Andre Przywara
2026-08-04 10:06 ` Andre Przywara [this message]
2026-08-04 10:06 ` [PATCH v8 09/11] arm_mpam: add MPAM-Fb MSC firmware access support Andre Przywara
2026-08-04 10:06 ` [PATCH v8 10/11] arm_mpam: change MPAM-Fb error IRQ to use a threaded IRQ handler Andre Przywara
2026-08-04 10:06 ` [PATCH v8 11/11] arm_mpam: detect and enable MPAM-Fb PCC support Andre Przywara
2026-08-04 12:28 ` [PATCH v8 00/11] arm_mpam: Add MPAM-Fb firmware support Andre Przywara
2026-08-04 12:50   ` Ben Horgan
2026-08-04 13:02     ` Andre Przywara
2026-08-04 13:36   ` Srivathsa L Rao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260804100627.3217149-9-andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --to=andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=ben.horgan@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=fenghuay@nvidia.com \
    --cc=ganapatrao.kulkarni@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=gshan@redhat.com \
    --cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=lee@trager.us \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=niyas.sait@arm.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=ritwick.sharma@arm.com \
    --cc=sramana@qti.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=srivathsa.rao@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@kernel.org \
    --cc=tsoni@quicinc.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox