From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>
To: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@arm.com>, Suyash Mahar <smahar@meta.com>,
Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Qi Liu <liuqi115@huawei.com>, Junhao He <hejunhao3@huawei.com>,
coresight@lists.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
sashiko-bot <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/8] coresight: tmc-etr: Don't stop Perf cleanup for active sysfs reads
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2026 17:45:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260812164532.GA313579@e132581.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260728-james-cs-multiple-per-threads-v3-1-6aee7579f1dc@linaro.org>
On Tue, Jul 28, 2026 at 04:00:13PM +0100, James Clark wrote:
> The linked fixes commit deliberately allows reads of an old sysfs buffer
> while in Perf mode because they are separate software buffers. However
> it didn't modify tmc_disable_etr_sink() to match this relaxation. The
> result is that when a Perf event ends while the sysfs buffer is being
> read, clean up will be skipped.
>
> Fix it by ignoring the sysfs_reading flag unless the active session is
> a sysfs one.
I am not clear why this is relevant to per-thread mode, maybe it would
be clear for me after reading other patches.
For this patch self, I think the issue comes from the sink buffer's life
time - SYSFS mode's buffer has longer life time than a sysfs session,
it is designed to allow reading sysfs trace data after the sysfs
session, or even during a perf session. So the code gets complex for
handling these cases.
I really think we should have a correct life time (or state machine)
for sysfs buffer, something like:
Operations | ETR sysfs buffer state machine
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
| INVALID: Init state, buffer unallocated
echo 1 > .../tmc_etr0/enable_sink | READY: user can read zeroed data
echo 1 > .../etm0/enable_source | BUSY: user cannot read as hardware is
| writing data to buffer
echo 0 > .../etm0/enable_source | READY: trace is stopped, user can read
| trace data
echo 0 > .../tmc_etr0/enable_sink | INVALID: buffer has been released
With the state machine's help, we might even don't need to bother what
the sink device's mode is.
> When sysfs and Perf share the same memory in ETR_MODE_RESRV mode, a new
> Perf session needs to overwrite an old inactive sysfs session by zeroing
> len. This avoids sysfs from reading stale data because it has a separate
> set of offsets in its etr_buf struct, even if that's backed by the same
> memory as the Perf one.
This can be naturally resolved if we have a state machine above?
[...]
> +static bool tmc_perf_sysfs_shared(struct tmc_drvdata *drvdata,
> + struct etr_buf *perf_buf)
> +{
> + /* In ETR_MODE_RESRV mode, sysfs and Perf share the same memory. */
> + return perf_buf &&
> + drvdata->sysfs_buf &&
> + drvdata->sysfs_buf->mode == ETR_MODE_RESRV &&
> + perf_buf->mode == ETR_MODE_RESRV;
> +}
> +
> static int tmc_enable_etr_sink_perf(struct coresight_device *csdev,
> struct coresight_path *path)
> {
> @@ -1772,6 +1782,18 @@ static int tmc_enable_etr_sink_perf(struct coresight_device *csdev,
> goto unlock_out;
> }
>
> + /*
> + * Don't use if it's shared and being read by sysfs. Sysfs may only
> + * start reading (the cleared zero length buffer) after the first
> + * tmc_enable_etr_sink_perf(), which changes the result of this check,
> + * so it should only be done once.
> + */
> + if ((drvdata->sysfs_reading &&
> + tmc_perf_sysfs_shared(drvdata, etr_perf->etr_buf))) {
> + rc = -EBUSY;
> + goto unlock_out;
> + }
This is quite tricky. If someone reads the sysfs entry in the middle of
a perf session, and the traced task is migrated to a different CPU or
wakes up, the sink device may need to be re-enabled, however the sink
enabling could fail due to the concurrent sysfs read here.
Thanks,
Leo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-12 16:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-28 15:00 [PATCH v3 0/8] coresight: Prevent per-thread events from sharing a sink James Clark
2026-07-28 15:00 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] coresight: tmc-etr: Don't stop Perf cleanup for active sysfs reads James Clark
2026-08-12 16:45 ` Leo Yan [this message]
2026-07-28 15:00 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] coresight: configfs: Don't assume active until cscfg_mgr is set James Clark
2026-07-28 15:00 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] coresight: etm-perf: Flush workqueue before unloading module James Clark
2026-07-28 15:00 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] coresight: tmc-etr: Prevent per-thread events from sharing a sink James Clark
2026-07-28 15:00 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] coresight: tmc-etr: Use session ID for buffer ownership James Clark
2026-07-28 15:00 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] coresight: tmc-etf: Prevent per-thread events from sharing a sink James Clark
2026-07-28 15:00 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] coresight: etb10: " James Clark
2026-07-28 15:00 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] coresight: ultrasoc-smb: " James Clark
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260812164532.GA313579@e132581.arm.com \
--to=leo.yan@arm.com \
--cc=coresight@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hejunhao3@huawei.com \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuqi115@huawei.com \
--cc=mike.leach@arm.com \
--cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=smahar@meta.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=yeoreum.yun@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox