From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Diederik de Haas <diederik@cknow-tech.com>
Cc: Dawid Olesinski <dawidro@gmail.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
Corentin Labbe <clabbe@baylibre.com>,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] crypto: rockchip: Add RK356x/RK3588 cryptographic offloader
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2026 11:58:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260818185810.GA7030@quark> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DKF8V3IHKTL2.1PUA8O5IVIRYC@cknow-tech.com>
On Mon, Aug 03, 2026 at 12:42:03PM +0200, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> crypto-rk3566-test-no-crypto-module-log.txt:
> https://paste.sr.ht/~diederik/bb5dbfd59f244a6422b965b30f9796ebbfdb1fcb
> crypto-rk3566-test-with-crypto-module-log.txt:
> https://paste.sr.ht/~diederik/ea72297678e19cbbc987de9548f9884382e1d1cc
> crypto-rk3568-test-no-crypto-module-log.txt:
> https://paste.sr.ht/~diederik/309e519e6b1c31f4c1c5bcb1ea16cc8569a54830
> crypto-rk3568-test-with-crypto-module-log.txt:
> https://paste.sr.ht/~diederik/1e1e938ebbbae75128974fe0a7c240843bce04c8
> crypto-rk3588-test-no-crypto-module-log.txt:
> https://paste.sr.ht/~diederik/9a2adc2b2e42131445ce4576589e00ecf51ccb4b
> crypto-rk3588-test-with-crypto-module-log.txt:
> https://paste.sr.ht/~diederik/e04c11c8809031ca45662f7d4c227c1ba6162b65
Thanks for running some benchmarks!
Looking at your results for rk3566 for example, SHA-256 on 4096-byte
blocks is 115 cycles/operation for sha256-lib (i.e. ARMv8 CE) or 3027
cycles/operation for rk2-sha256. So the Rockchip driver is 26 times
slower than simply using the existing well-tested CPU-based code.
Don't you love "accelerators" that make things 26 times slower?
I guess we'll get the usual argument that this driver is really just for
"testing" or whatever.
- Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-18 18:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-08 17:58 [PATCH v2 0/4] crypto: rockchip: Add RK356x/RK3588 cryptographic offloader Dawid Olesinski
2026-07-08 17:58 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: crypto: rockchip: Add RK356x/RK3588 crypto engine binding Dawid Olesinski
2026-07-08 23:53 ` Sebastian Reichel
2026-07-08 17:58 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] crypto: rockchip: Add RK356x/RK3588 cryptographic offloader driver Dawid Olesinski
2026-07-08 17:58 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add crypto node to rk356x-base Dawid Olesinski
2026-07-08 23:56 ` Sebastian Reichel
2026-07-09 7:07 ` Heiko Stübner
2026-07-10 14:30 ` Dawid Olesinski
2026-07-25 14:13 ` Diederik de Haas
2026-07-08 17:58 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add crypto node to rk3588-base Dawid Olesinski
2026-08-03 10:42 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] crypto: rockchip: Add RK356x/RK3588 cryptographic offloader Diederik de Haas
2026-08-18 18:58 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2026-08-18 19:31 ` Diederik de Haas
2026-08-18 20:04 ` Eric Biggers
2026-08-18 20:23 ` Diederik de Haas
2026-08-18 20:37 ` Eric Biggers
2026-08-16 19:39 ` [PATCH v3 " Dawid Olesinski
2026-08-16 19:39 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: crypto: rockchip: Add RK356x/RK3588 crypto engine binding Dawid Olesinski
2026-08-17 8:14 ` Diederik de Haas
2026-08-18 7:42 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-08-16 19:39 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] crypto: rockchip: Add RK356x/RK3588 cryptographic offloader driver Dawid Olesinski
2026-08-18 7:36 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-08-18 17:43 ` Eric Biggers
2026-08-16 19:39 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add crypto node to rk356x-base Dawid Olesinski
2026-08-16 19:39 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add crypto node to rk3588-base Dawid Olesinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260818185810.GA7030@quark \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=clabbe@baylibre.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dawidro@gmail.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=diederik@cknow-tech.com \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox