Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] arm64/mm: Move __check_safe_pte_update()
Date: Tue,  1 Sep 2026 12:24:53 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260901065454.1906343-2-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260901065454.1906343-1-anshuman.khandual@arm.com>

The page table entry print helpers and related macros which are defined in
<linux/pgtable.h> will not be accessible in platform <asm/pgtable.h> which
is basically caused by cycling dependency.

Move __check_safe_pte_update() inside arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c as a preparation
for subsequent usage of the afore mentioned generic MM helpers.

This does not cause any functional change.

Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
---
Should __check_safe_pte_update() be wrapped in #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
along with dropping off current IS_ENABLED() test. That would ensure
the function never gets called when CONFIG_DEBUG_VM is disabled. That
will preserve current behaviour as the inline function gets dropped
when CONFIG_DEBUG_VM remains disabled.

 arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 47 +-------------------------------
 arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c              | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
index e89ec5f4787b..61fbfab3e06e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
@@ -387,52 +387,7 @@ static inline pte_t __ptep_get(pte_t *ptep)
 extern void __sync_icache_dcache(pte_t pteval);
 bool pgattr_change_is_safe(pteval_t old, pteval_t new);
 
-/*
- * PTE bits configuration in the presence of hardware Dirty Bit Management
- * (PTE_WRITE == PTE_DBM):
- *
- * Dirty  Writable | PTE_RDONLY  PTE_WRITE  PTE_DIRTY (sw)
- *   0      0      |   1           0          0
- *   0      1      |   1           1          0
- *   1      0      |   1           0          1
- *   1      1      |   0           1          x
- *
- * When hardware DBM is not present, the software PTE_DIRTY bit is updated via
- * the page fault mechanism. Checking the dirty status of a pte becomes:
- *
- *   PTE_DIRTY || (PTE_WRITE && !PTE_RDONLY)
- */
-
-static inline void __check_safe_pte_update(struct mm_struct *mm, pte_t *ptep,
-					   pte_t pte)
-{
-	pte_t old_pte;
-
-	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_VM))
-		return;
-
-	old_pte = __ptep_get(ptep);
-
-	if (!pte_valid(old_pte) || !pte_valid(pte))
-		return;
-	if (mm != current->active_mm && atomic_read(&mm->mm_users) <= 1)
-		return;
-
-	/*
-	 * Check for potential race with hardware updates of the pte
-	 * (__ptep_set_access_flags safely changes valid ptes without going
-	 * through an invalid entry).
-	 */
-	VM_WARN_ONCE(!pte_young(pte),
-		     "%s: racy access flag clearing: 0x%016llx -> 0x%016llx",
-		     __func__, pte_val(old_pte), pte_val(pte));
-	VM_WARN_ONCE(pte_write(old_pte) && !pte_dirty(pte),
-		     "%s: racy dirty state clearing: 0x%016llx -> 0x%016llx",
-		     __func__, pte_val(old_pte), pte_val(pte));
-	VM_WARN_ONCE(!pgattr_change_is_safe(pte_val(old_pte), pte_val(pte)),
-		     "%s: unsafe attribute change: 0x%016llx -> 0x%016llx",
-		     __func__, pte_val(old_pte), pte_val(pte));
-}
+void __check_safe_pte_update(struct mm_struct *mm, pte_t *ptep, pte_t pte);
 
 static inline void __sync_cache_and_tags(pte_t pte, unsigned int nr_pages)
 {
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
index 79d90226fd5d..e9c66d26bc0a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
@@ -2392,4 +2392,49 @@ int arch_set_user_pkey_access(int pkey, unsigned long init_val)
 
 	return 0;
 }
+
+/*
+ * PTE bits configuration in the presence of hardware Dirty Bit Management
+ * (PTE_WRITE == PTE_DBM):
+ *
+ * Dirty  Writable | PTE_RDONLY  PTE_WRITE  PTE_DIRTY (sw)
+ *   0      0      |   1           0          0
+ *   0      1      |   1           1          0
+ *   1      0      |   1           0          1
+ *   1      1      |   0           1          x
+ *
+ * When hardware DBM is not present, the software PTE_DIRTY bit is updated via
+ * the page fault mechanism. Checking the dirty status of a pte becomes:
+ *
+ *   PTE_DIRTY || (PTE_WRITE && !PTE_RDONLY)
+ */
+void __check_safe_pte_update(struct mm_struct *mm, pte_t *ptep, pte_t pte)
+{
+	pte_t old_pte;
+
+	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_VM))
+		return;
+
+	old_pte = __ptep_get(ptep);
+
+	if (!pte_valid(old_pte) || !pte_valid(pte))
+		return;
+	if (mm != current->active_mm && atomic_read(&mm->mm_users) <= 1)
+		return;
+
+	/*
+	 * Check for potential race with hardware updates of the pte
+	 * (__ptep_set_access_flags safely changes valid ptes without going
+	 * through an invalid entry).
+	 */
+	VM_WARN_ONCE(!pte_young(pte),
+		     "%s: racy access flag clearing: 0x%016llx -> 0x%016llx",
+		     __func__, pte_val(old_pte), pte_val(pte));
+	VM_WARN_ONCE(pte_write(old_pte) && !pte_dirty(pte),
+		     "%s: racy dirty state clearing: 0x%016llx -> 0x%016llx",
+		     __func__, pte_val(old_pte), pte_val(pte));
+	VM_WARN_ONCE(!pgattr_change_is_safe(pte_val(old_pte), pte_val(pte)),
+		     "%s: unsafe attribute change: 0x%016llx -> 0x%016llx",
+		     __func__, pte_val(old_pte), pte_val(pte));
+}
 #endif
-- 
2.43.0



  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-01  6:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-01  6:54 [PATCH 0/2] arm64/mm: Standardize printing for pgtable entries Anshuman Khandual
2026-09-01  6:54 ` Anshuman Khandual [this message]
2026-09-01  6:54 ` [PATCH 2/2] " Anshuman Khandual

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260901065454.1906343-2-anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --to=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox