From: Laurentiu Mihalcea <laurentiumihalcea111@gmail.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>, Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
elena.popa@nxp.com, cosmin.stoica@nxp.com
Cc: Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/2] Introduce basic support for MR-NAVQ95
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2026 06:19:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260901131918.1189-1-laurentiumihalcea111@gmail.com> (raw)
From: Laurentiu Mihalcea <laurentiu.mihalcea@nxp.com>
Hi folks,
So, as the title says, this series attempts to introduce basic support for
NXP's MR-NAVQ95 board. The "basic support" refers to introducing a new DTS
and enabling a couple of peripherals so that the board'll be able to boot
from eMMC/SD/NFS.
So, compared to MX95-19x19-EVK, this board has a smaller form factor
(comparable to the MX95-based FRDM boards) and is designed for
robotics-related applications (e.g. drones, rovers, humanoids, etc...).
The board is currently at revision B and is only available internally.
The board should be officially announced around October/November 2026.
Given that the board and its support are fairly new and still under
development, I would expect some (hopefully) small changes to the DTS.
Hopefully, this'll be acceptable.
The schematics, a brief overview and some pictures of the board are
publicly available at [1].
[1]: https://github.com/NXP-Robotics/MR-NAVQ95
---
Changes in v3:
* use "gpios" instead of the deprecated "gpio" for the "regulator-usdhc2"
node.
* fix issues raised by running "dt-check-style --mode strict". Note that
"dt-check-style" still reports the following issues:
[property-order] property 'compatible' out of canonical order [...]
[line-length] line exceeds 80 columns [...]
these'll be fixed by Krzysztof Kozlowski's on-going patches: [3]. Manually
applied his patches and dt-check-style seems happy with the DTS.
* link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/imx/20260827150657.1657-1-laurentiumihalcea111@gmail.com/
[3]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260826-n-dts-style-checker-continued-v5-0-fdd16ca6e771@oss.qualcomm.com/
Changes in v2:
* remove the "pinctrl_usdhc2_100mhz", "pinctrl_usdhc2_200mhz", and
"pinctrl_usdhc1_100mhz" DT nodes as they have the same configuration
as "pinctrl_usdhc2" and "pinctrl_usdhc1", respectively.
* add "bootph-pre-ram" property to all nodes that were included in Elena's
u-boot patches. See [2]. Note that "imx95-u-boot.dtsi" is still required
for the binman node and for the rest of the nodes tagged with
"bootph-pre-ram".
* link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/imx/20260825120812.2152-1-laurentiumihalcea111@gmail.com/
[2]: https://lists.u-boot-project.org/pipermail/u-boot/2026-August/629002.html
---
Laurentiu Mihalcea (2):
dt-bindings: arm: fsl: add MR-NAVQ95 board
arm64: dts: freescale: add MR-NAVQ95 basic board support
.../devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml | 1 +
arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/Makefile | 1 +
arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx95-navq.dts | 222 ++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 224 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx95-navq.dts
--
2.53.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-09-01 13:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-01 13:19 Laurentiu Mihalcea [this message]
2026-09-01 13:19 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: add MR-NAVQ95 board Laurentiu Mihalcea
2026-09-01 13:19 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] arm64: dts: freescale: add MR-NAVQ95 basic board support Laurentiu Mihalcea
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260901131918.1189-1-laurentiumihalcea111@gmail.com \
--to=laurentiumihalcea111@gmail.com \
--cc=Frank.Li@nxp.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=cosmin.stoica@nxp.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=elena.popa@nxp.com \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox