Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhijian Han <hanzhijian1991@gmail.com>
To: "Richard Zhu" <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>,
	"Lucas Stach" <l.stach@pengutronix.de>,
	"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kwilczynski@kernel.org>,
	"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@kernel.org>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Frank Li" <Frank.Li@nxp.com>,
	"Sascha Hauer" <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	sashiko-bot@kernel.org, Zhijian Han <hanzhijian1991@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v6] PCI: imx6: fix resource leaks in probe error paths
Date: Fri,  4 Sep 2026 00:03:42 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260903160342.3282199-1-hanzhijian1991@gmail.com> (raw)

imx_pcie_probe() leaks both pwrctrl devices and power domains on failure:

- imx_pcie_attach_pd() attaches the "pcie" and "pcie_phy" power domains
  and adds device links to them, but nothing detaches the domains or
  removes the links on probe failure or deferral, so they leak.

- A failure of devm_pm_runtime_set_active_enabled() returns directly
  without destroying the pwrctrl devices.

- A partial failure inside imx_pcie_attach_pd() leaks the power domains
  that were already attached.

Add imx_pcie_detach_pd() to remove the device links and detach the power
domains in reverse order of acquisition and register it with
devm_add_action_or_reset() so they are released automatically on probe
failure.

Reported-by: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260822013640.182C01F000E9@smtp.kernel.org/
Fixes: 2c5768344f88 ("PCI: imx6: Move pci_pwrctrl_create_devices() to imx_pcie_probe()")
Signed-off-by: Zhijian Han <hanzhijian1991@gmail.com>
---
Changes in v6:
- Keep the device links stateless and remove them with device_link_del()
  in imx_pcie_detach_pd() instead of using DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_CONSUMER,
  which creates managed links to power-domain devices that never bind a
  driver and would trigger a WARN_ON in device_links_driver_bound()

Changes in v5:
- Register imx_pcie_detach_pd() with devm_add_action_or_reset() instead
  of calling it manually on the error paths

 drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
index 39790e66b98d..7dd22b4f826a 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
@@ -180,8 +180,12 @@ struct imx_pcie {
 	struct imx_lut_data	luts[IMX95_MAX_LUT];
 	/* power domain for pcie */
 	struct device		*pd_pcie;
+	/* device link for pcie power domain */
+	struct device_link	*pd_link;
 	/* power domain for pcie phy */
 	struct device		*pd_pcie_phy;
+	/* device link for pcie phy power domain */
+	struct device_link	*pd_phy_link;
 	struct phy		*phy;
 	const struct imx_pcie_drvdata *drvdata;
 
@@ -639,10 +643,34 @@ static int imx6q_pcie_abort_handler(unsigned long addr,
 }
 #endif
 
+static void imx_pcie_detach_pd(struct imx_pcie *imx_pcie)
+{
+	if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(imx_pcie->pd_phy_link)) {
+		device_link_del(imx_pcie->pd_phy_link);
+		imx_pcie->pd_phy_link = NULL;
+	}
+	if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(imx_pcie->pd_link)) {
+		device_link_del(imx_pcie->pd_link);
+		imx_pcie->pd_link = NULL;
+	}
+	if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(imx_pcie->pd_pcie_phy)) {
+		dev_pm_domain_detach(imx_pcie->pd_pcie_phy, true);
+		imx_pcie->pd_pcie_phy = NULL;
+	}
+	if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(imx_pcie->pd_pcie)) {
+		dev_pm_domain_detach(imx_pcie->pd_pcie, true);
+		imx_pcie->pd_pcie = NULL;
+	}
+}
+
+static void imx_pcie_detach_pd_action(void *data)
+{
+	imx_pcie_detach_pd(data);
+}
+
 static int imx_pcie_attach_pd(struct device *dev)
 {
 	struct imx_pcie *imx_pcie = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
-	struct device_link *link;
 
 	/* Do nothing when in a single power domain */
 	if (dev->pm_domain)
@@ -654,25 +682,31 @@ static int imx_pcie_attach_pd(struct device *dev)
 	/* Do nothing when power domain missing */
 	if (!imx_pcie->pd_pcie)
 		return 0;
-	link = device_link_add(dev, imx_pcie->pd_pcie,
-			DL_FLAG_STATELESS |
+	imx_pcie->pd_link = device_link_add(dev, imx_pcie->pd_pcie,
+					    DL_FLAG_STATELESS |
 			DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME |
 			DL_FLAG_RPM_ACTIVE);
-	if (!link) {
+	if (!imx_pcie->pd_link) {
 		dev_err(dev, "Failed to add device_link to pcie pd\n");
+		imx_pcie_detach_pd(imx_pcie);
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
 	imx_pcie->pd_pcie_phy = dev_pm_domain_attach_by_name(dev, "pcie_phy");
-	if (IS_ERR(imx_pcie->pd_pcie_phy))
-		return PTR_ERR(imx_pcie->pd_pcie_phy);
+	if (IS_ERR(imx_pcie->pd_pcie_phy)) {
+		int ret = PTR_ERR(imx_pcie->pd_pcie_phy);
+
+		imx_pcie_detach_pd(imx_pcie);
+		return ret;
+	}
 
-	link = device_link_add(dev, imx_pcie->pd_pcie_phy,
-			DL_FLAG_STATELESS |
+	imx_pcie->pd_phy_link = device_link_add(dev, imx_pcie->pd_pcie_phy,
+						DL_FLAG_STATELESS |
 			DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME |
 			DL_FLAG_RPM_ACTIVE);
-	if (!link) {
+	if (!imx_pcie->pd_phy_link) {
 		dev_err(dev, "Failed to add device_link to pcie_phy pd\n");
+		imx_pcie_detach_pd(imx_pcie);
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
@@ -1955,6 +1989,10 @@ static int imx_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
+	ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, imx_pcie_detach_pd_action, imx_pcie);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
 	ret = pci_pwrctrl_create_devices(dev);
 	if (ret)
 		return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to create pwrctrl devices\n");
@@ -1975,7 +2013,7 @@ static int imx_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 			pm_runtime_no_callbacks(dev);
 			ret = devm_pm_runtime_set_active_enabled(dev);
 			if (ret < 0)
-				return ret;
+				goto err_pwrctrl_destroy;
 		}
 
 		if (imx_check_flag(imx_pcie, IMX_PCIE_FLAG_SKIP_L23_READY))


             reply	other threads:[~2026-09-03 16:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-03 16:03 Zhijian Han [this message]
2026-09-03 19:10 ` [PATCH v6] PCI: imx6: fix resource leaks in probe error paths Frank Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260903160342.3282199-1-hanzhijian1991@gmail.com \
    --to=hanzhijian1991@gmail.com \
    --cc=Frank.Li@nxp.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=festevam@gmail.com \
    --cc=hongxing.zhu@nxp.com \
    --cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
    --cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=mani@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox