From: Zhijian Han <hanzhijian1991@gmail.com>
To: "Richard Zhu" <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>,
"Lucas Stach" <l.stach@pengutronix.de>,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kwilczynski@kernel.org>,
"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@kernel.org>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Frank Li" <Frank.Li@nxp.com>,
"Sascha Hauer" <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
sashiko-bot@kernel.org, Zhijian Han <hanzhijian1991@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v6] PCI: imx6: fix resource leaks in probe error paths
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2026 00:03:42 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260903160342.3282199-1-hanzhijian1991@gmail.com> (raw)
imx_pcie_probe() leaks both pwrctrl devices and power domains on failure:
- imx_pcie_attach_pd() attaches the "pcie" and "pcie_phy" power domains
and adds device links to them, but nothing detaches the domains or
removes the links on probe failure or deferral, so they leak.
- A failure of devm_pm_runtime_set_active_enabled() returns directly
without destroying the pwrctrl devices.
- A partial failure inside imx_pcie_attach_pd() leaks the power domains
that were already attached.
Add imx_pcie_detach_pd() to remove the device links and detach the power
domains in reverse order of acquisition and register it with
devm_add_action_or_reset() so they are released automatically on probe
failure.
Reported-by: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260822013640.182C01F000E9@smtp.kernel.org/
Fixes: 2c5768344f88 ("PCI: imx6: Move pci_pwrctrl_create_devices() to imx_pcie_probe()")
Signed-off-by: Zhijian Han <hanzhijian1991@gmail.com>
---
Changes in v6:
- Keep the device links stateless and remove them with device_link_del()
in imx_pcie_detach_pd() instead of using DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_CONSUMER,
which creates managed links to power-domain devices that never bind a
driver and would trigger a WARN_ON in device_links_driver_bound()
Changes in v5:
- Register imx_pcie_detach_pd() with devm_add_action_or_reset() instead
of calling it manually on the error paths
drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
index 39790e66b98d..7dd22b4f826a 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
@@ -180,8 +180,12 @@ struct imx_pcie {
struct imx_lut_data luts[IMX95_MAX_LUT];
/* power domain for pcie */
struct device *pd_pcie;
+ /* device link for pcie power domain */
+ struct device_link *pd_link;
/* power domain for pcie phy */
struct device *pd_pcie_phy;
+ /* device link for pcie phy power domain */
+ struct device_link *pd_phy_link;
struct phy *phy;
const struct imx_pcie_drvdata *drvdata;
@@ -639,10 +643,34 @@ static int imx6q_pcie_abort_handler(unsigned long addr,
}
#endif
+static void imx_pcie_detach_pd(struct imx_pcie *imx_pcie)
+{
+ if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(imx_pcie->pd_phy_link)) {
+ device_link_del(imx_pcie->pd_phy_link);
+ imx_pcie->pd_phy_link = NULL;
+ }
+ if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(imx_pcie->pd_link)) {
+ device_link_del(imx_pcie->pd_link);
+ imx_pcie->pd_link = NULL;
+ }
+ if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(imx_pcie->pd_pcie_phy)) {
+ dev_pm_domain_detach(imx_pcie->pd_pcie_phy, true);
+ imx_pcie->pd_pcie_phy = NULL;
+ }
+ if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(imx_pcie->pd_pcie)) {
+ dev_pm_domain_detach(imx_pcie->pd_pcie, true);
+ imx_pcie->pd_pcie = NULL;
+ }
+}
+
+static void imx_pcie_detach_pd_action(void *data)
+{
+ imx_pcie_detach_pd(data);
+}
+
static int imx_pcie_attach_pd(struct device *dev)
{
struct imx_pcie *imx_pcie = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
- struct device_link *link;
/* Do nothing when in a single power domain */
if (dev->pm_domain)
@@ -654,25 +682,31 @@ static int imx_pcie_attach_pd(struct device *dev)
/* Do nothing when power domain missing */
if (!imx_pcie->pd_pcie)
return 0;
- link = device_link_add(dev, imx_pcie->pd_pcie,
- DL_FLAG_STATELESS |
+ imx_pcie->pd_link = device_link_add(dev, imx_pcie->pd_pcie,
+ DL_FLAG_STATELESS |
DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME |
DL_FLAG_RPM_ACTIVE);
- if (!link) {
+ if (!imx_pcie->pd_link) {
dev_err(dev, "Failed to add device_link to pcie pd\n");
+ imx_pcie_detach_pd(imx_pcie);
return -EINVAL;
}
imx_pcie->pd_pcie_phy = dev_pm_domain_attach_by_name(dev, "pcie_phy");
- if (IS_ERR(imx_pcie->pd_pcie_phy))
- return PTR_ERR(imx_pcie->pd_pcie_phy);
+ if (IS_ERR(imx_pcie->pd_pcie_phy)) {
+ int ret = PTR_ERR(imx_pcie->pd_pcie_phy);
+
+ imx_pcie_detach_pd(imx_pcie);
+ return ret;
+ }
- link = device_link_add(dev, imx_pcie->pd_pcie_phy,
- DL_FLAG_STATELESS |
+ imx_pcie->pd_phy_link = device_link_add(dev, imx_pcie->pd_pcie_phy,
+ DL_FLAG_STATELESS |
DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME |
DL_FLAG_RPM_ACTIVE);
- if (!link) {
+ if (!imx_pcie->pd_phy_link) {
dev_err(dev, "Failed to add device_link to pcie_phy pd\n");
+ imx_pcie_detach_pd(imx_pcie);
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -1955,6 +1989,10 @@ static int imx_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (ret)
return ret;
+ ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, imx_pcie_detach_pd_action, imx_pcie);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
ret = pci_pwrctrl_create_devices(dev);
if (ret)
return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to create pwrctrl devices\n");
@@ -1975,7 +2013,7 @@ static int imx_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
pm_runtime_no_callbacks(dev);
ret = devm_pm_runtime_set_active_enabled(dev);
if (ret < 0)
- return ret;
+ goto err_pwrctrl_destroy;
}
if (imx_check_flag(imx_pcie, IMX_PCIE_FLAG_SKIP_L23_READY))
next reply other threads:[~2026-09-03 16:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-03 16:03 Zhijian Han [this message]
2026-09-03 19:10 ` [PATCH v6] PCI: imx6: fix resource leaks in probe error paths Frank Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260903160342.3282199-1-hanzhijian1991@gmail.com \
--to=hanzhijian1991@gmail.com \
--cc=Frank.Li@nxp.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=hongxing.zhu@nxp.com \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
--cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox