From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, vladimir.murzin@arm.com,
usama.anjum@arm.com, peterz@infradead.org,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, david.laight.linux@gmail.com,
stable@vger.kernel.org, ruanjinjie@huawei.com,
james.morse@arm.com, yang@os.amperecomputing.com, cl@gentwo.org,
maz@kernel.org, will@kernel.org, ardb@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 16/21] arm64: percpu: Implement preemptible void RMW ops
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2026 17:17:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260904161758.376504-17-mark.rutland@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260904161758.376504-1-mark.rutland@arm.com>
Use the PCPU GPR infrastructure to implement all of the RMW ops which do
not return a value.
Test case:
| void outline_this_cpu_add_u64(u64 __percpu *p, u64 v)
| {
| this_cpu_add(*p, v);
| }
Generated code before this patch (v7.2-rc4):
| <outline_this_cpu_add_u64>:
| paciasp
| stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
| mrs x2, sp_el0
| mov x29, sp
| ldr w3, [x2, #8]
| add w3, w3, #0x1
| str w3, [x2, #8]
| mrs x3, tpidr_el1
| add x0, x0, x3
| 1: ldxr x5, [x0]
| add x5, x5, x1
| stxr w4, x5, [x0]
| cbnz w4, 1b
| ldr x0, [x2, #8]
| sub x0, x0, #0x1
| str w0, [x2, #8]
| cbz x0, 2f
| ldr x0, [x2, #8]
| cbnz x0, 3f
| 2: bl preempt_schedule_notrace
| 3: ldp x29, x30, [sp], #16
| autiasp
| ret
Generated code after this patch:
| <outline_this_cpu_add_u64>:
| mrs x2, sp_el0
| mov w4, #0xc80
| strh w4, [x2, #20]
| mrs x4, tpidr_el1
| add x3, x0, x4
| 1: ldxr x6, [x3]
| add x6, x6, x1
| stxr w5, x6, [x3]
| cbnz w5, 1b
| strh wzr, [x2, #20]
| ret
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Tested-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@arm.com>
Cc: Ada Couprie Diaz <ada.coupriediaz@arm.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Yang Shi <yang@os.amperecomputing.com>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h
index 984f69846cc09..504a7fefa2015 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h
@@ -168,23 +168,35 @@ static inline void __percpu_write_##sz(void __percpu *pcp, unsigned long val) \
#define __PERCPU_OP_CASE(w, sfx, name, sz, op_llsc, op_lse) \
static inline void \
-__percpu_##name##_case_##sz(void *ptr, unsigned long val) \
+__percpu_##name##_case_##sz(void __percpu *pcp, unsigned long val) \
{ \
+ u16 *gprs = ¤t_thread_info()->pcpu_gprs; \
+ unsigned long addr; \
+ unsigned long off; \
unsigned int loop; \
u##sz tmp; \
\
- asm volatile (ARM64_LSE_ATOMIC_INSN( \
+ asm volatile ( \
+ __PCPU_GPRS_BEGIN("%[gprs]", "%[pcp]", "%[off]", "%[addr]") \
+ ARM64_LSE_ATOMIC_INSN( \
/* LL/SC */ \
- "1: ldxr" #sfx "\t%" #w "[tmp], %[ptr]\n" \
+ "1: ldxr" #sfx "\t%" #w "[tmp], [%[addr]]\n" \
#op_llsc "\t%" #w "[tmp], %" #w "[tmp], %" #w "[val]\n" \
- " stxr" #sfx "\t%w[loop], %" #w "[tmp], %[ptr]\n" \
+ " stxr" #sfx "\t%w[loop], %" #w "[tmp], [%[addr]]\n" \
" cbnz %w[loop], 1b", \
/* LSE atomics */ \
- #op_lse #sfx "\t%" #w "[val], %" #w "[tmp], %[ptr]\n" \
+ #op_lse #sfx "\t%" #w "[val], %" #w "[tmp], [%[addr]]\n"\
__nops(3)) \
- : [loop] "=&r" (loop), [tmp] "=&r" (tmp), \
- [ptr] "+Q"(*(u##sz *)ptr) \
- : [val] "r" ((u##sz)(val))); \
+ __PCPU_GPRS_END("%[gprs]") \
+ : [gprs] "=Qo" (*gprs), \
+ [addr] "=&r" (addr), \
+ [off] "=&r" (off), \
+ [loop] "=&r" (loop), \
+ [tmp] "=&r" (tmp) \
+ : [pcp] "r" (pcp), \
+ [val] "r" ((u##sz)(val)) \
+ : "memory" \
+ ); \
}
#define __PERCPU_RET_OP_CASE(w, sfx, name, sz, op_llsc, op_lse) \
@@ -301,13 +313,13 @@ PERCPU_RET_OP(add, add, ldadd)
_pcp_wrap(__percpu_write_64, pcp, (unsigned long)(val))
#define this_cpu_add_1(pcp, val) \
- _pcp_protect(__percpu_add_case_8, pcp, val)
+ _pcp_wrap(__percpu_add_case_8, pcp, val)
#define this_cpu_add_2(pcp, val) \
- _pcp_protect(__percpu_add_case_16, pcp, val)
+ _pcp_wrap(__percpu_add_case_16, pcp, val)
#define this_cpu_add_4(pcp, val) \
- _pcp_protect(__percpu_add_case_32, pcp, val)
+ _pcp_wrap(__percpu_add_case_32, pcp, val)
#define this_cpu_add_8(pcp, val) \
- _pcp_protect(__percpu_add_case_64, pcp, val)
+ _pcp_wrap(__percpu_add_case_64, pcp, val)
#define this_cpu_add_return_1(pcp, val) \
_pcp_protect_return(__percpu_add_return_case_8, pcp, val)
@@ -319,22 +331,22 @@ PERCPU_RET_OP(add, add, ldadd)
_pcp_protect_return(__percpu_add_return_case_64, pcp, val)
#define this_cpu_and_1(pcp, val) \
- _pcp_protect(__percpu_andnot_case_8, pcp, ~(u8)(val))
+ _pcp_wrap(__percpu_andnot_case_8, pcp, ~(u8)(val))
#define this_cpu_and_2(pcp, val) \
- _pcp_protect(__percpu_andnot_case_16, pcp, ~(u16)(val))
+ _pcp_wrap(__percpu_andnot_case_16, pcp, ~(u16)(val))
#define this_cpu_and_4(pcp, val) \
- _pcp_protect(__percpu_andnot_case_32, pcp, ~(u32)(val))
+ _pcp_wrap(__percpu_andnot_case_32, pcp, ~(u32)(val))
#define this_cpu_and_8(pcp, val) \
- _pcp_protect(__percpu_andnot_case_64, pcp, ~(u64)(val))
+ _pcp_wrap(__percpu_andnot_case_64, pcp, ~(u64)(val))
#define this_cpu_or_1(pcp, val) \
- _pcp_protect(__percpu_or_case_8, pcp, val)
+ _pcp_wrap(__percpu_or_case_8, pcp, val)
#define this_cpu_or_2(pcp, val) \
- _pcp_protect(__percpu_or_case_16, pcp, val)
+ _pcp_wrap(__percpu_or_case_16, pcp, val)
#define this_cpu_or_4(pcp, val) \
- _pcp_protect(__percpu_or_case_32, pcp, val)
+ _pcp_wrap(__percpu_or_case_32, pcp, val)
#define this_cpu_or_8(pcp, val) \
- _pcp_protect(__percpu_or_case_64, pcp, val)
+ _pcp_wrap(__percpu_or_case_64, pcp, val)
#define this_cpu_xchg_1(pcp, val) \
_pcp_protect_return(xchg_relaxed, pcp, val)
--
2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-04 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-04 16:17 [PATCH v3 00/21] arm64: Preemptible this_cpu_*() operations Mark Rutland
2026-09-04 16:17 ` [PATCH v3 03/21] arm64: percpu: Fix LSE operations on {8,16}-bit types Mark Rutland
2026-09-04 16:17 ` [PATCH v3 05/21] arm64: cmpxchg128: LSE: Remove redundant operands Mark Rutland
2026-09-04 16:17 ` [PATCH v3 07/21] arm64: preempt: Treat should_resched() as unlikely Mark Rutland
2026-09-04 16:17 ` [PATCH v3 08/21] arm64: ptrace: Always inline pt_regs_[read,write}_reg() Mark Rutland
2026-09-04 16:17 ` [PATCH v3 09/21] arm64: percpu: Factor out percpu offset asm Mark Rutland
2026-09-04 16:17 ` [PATCH v3 10/21] arm64: gpr-num: Add wxN aliases for wN registers Mark Rutland
2026-09-04 16:17 ` [PATCH v3 12/21] arm64: entry: sdei: Restore all clobberable GPRs Mark Rutland
2026-09-04 16:17 ` [PATCH v3 14/21] arm64: percpu: Add infrastructure for preemptible this_cpu_*() ops Mark Rutland
2026-09-04 16:17 ` [PATCH v3 15/21] arm64: percpu: Implement preemptible read/write ops Mark Rutland
2026-09-04 16:17 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2026-09-05 9:03 ` [PATCH v3 16/21] arm64: percpu: Implement preemptible void RMW ops David Laight
2026-09-04 16:17 ` [PATCH v3 17/21] arm64: percpu: Implement preemptible return " Mark Rutland
2026-09-04 16:17 ` [PATCH v3 18/21] arm64: percpu: Implement preemptible XCHG ops Mark Rutland
2026-09-04 16:17 ` [PATCH v3 19/21] arm64: percpu: Implement preemptible CMPXCHG ops Mark Rutland
2026-09-04 16:17 ` [PATCH v3 20/21] arm64: percpu: Implement preemptible CMPXCHG128 ops Mark Rutland
2026-09-04 16:17 ` [PATCH v3 21/21] arm64: percpu: Remove _pcp_protect*() wrappers Mark Rutland
2026-09-04 16:54 ` [PATCH v3 01/21] arm64: percpu: Fix this_cpu_write() casting Mark Rutland
2026-09-04 16:56 ` [PATCH v3 02/21] arm64: percpu: Fix this_cpu_and() mask generation Mark Rutland
2026-09-04 16:56 ` [PATCH v3 04/21] arm64: cmpxchg: LL/SC: Avoid redundant extension Mark Rutland
2026-09-04 16:57 ` [PATCH v3 06/21] arm64: preempt: Simplify and optimize __preempt_count_dec_and_test() Mark Rutland
2026-09-04 16:59 ` [PATCH v3 13/21] arm64: entry: sdei: Make 'tsk' available Mark Rutland
2026-09-04 17:43 ` [PATCH v3 00/21] arm64: Preemptible this_cpu_*() operations Mark Rutland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260904161758.376504-17-mark.rutland@arm.com \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=usama.anjum@arm.com \
--cc=vladimir.murzin@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox