From: Ding Hui <dinghui1111@163.com>
To: andrew@lunn.ch
Cc: alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch,
davem@davemloft.net, dinghui1111@163.com, dinghui@lixiang.com,
edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, liuxuanjun@lixiang.com,
maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com, mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, xiasanbo@lixiang.com,
yangchen11@lixiang.com
Subject: Re:Re: [PATCH] net: stmmac: fix NULL pointer dereference in tx/rx resource cleanup
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2026 23:34:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260905153453.1648537-1-dinghui1111@163.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3fd3506f-f254-4bff-a7ee-1063bf413919@lunn.ch>
At 2026-08-30 22:06:16, "Andrew Lunn" <andrew@lunn.ch> wrote:
>On Sun, Aug 30, 2026 at 12:06:08PM +0800, Ding Hui wrote:
>> From: Ding Hui <dinghui@lixiang.com>
>>
>> The DMA descriptor ring allocation in __init_dma_rx_desc_rings() and
>> __alloc_dma_tx_desc_resources() is split into multiple steps, each of
>> which may fail and return early while the per-queue cleanup paths still
>> call the free helpers for the partially-initialized queue.
>
>"and return early", is the real problem here. When a function returns
>an error, it should first undo what it has done, up to the point of
>the error.
>
>Rather than add extra NULL checks, please work on
>__init_dma_rx_desc_rings() and __alloc_dma_tx_desc_resources() and
>make them cleanup on error.
>
>I would say the problem you are trying to fix does not bother anybody,
>so is not for stable. So i aim the patches for net-next.
Thanks for the review and the direction.
You are right. The proper fix is to make __alloc_dma_rx_desc_resources()
and __alloc_dma_tx_desc_resources() clean up their own allocations on
error, rather than relying on the callers to handle partially-initialized
state.
I've reworked the patch accordingly: each function now will undo what they
have done before they return error. I also kept the NULL checks in the free
helpers as a defensive measure.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-05 15:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-30 4:06 [PATCH] net: stmmac: fix NULL pointer dereference in tx/rx resource cleanup Ding Hui
2026-08-30 14:06 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-09-05 15:34 ` Ding Hui [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260905153453.1648537-1-dinghui1111@163.com \
--to=dinghui1111@163.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dinghui@lixiang.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=liuxuanjun@lixiang.com \
--cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=xiasanbo@lixiang.com \
--cc=yangchen11@lixiang.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox