Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>,
	Steen Hegelund <steen.hegelund@microchip.com>,
	<UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com>,
	"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	"Jesper Dangaard Brouer" <hawk@kernel.org>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>,
	Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Mohsin Bashir <mohsin.bashr@gmail.com>
Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
	<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<bpf@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v6 07/14] net: lan966x: add FDMA ops dispatch for PCIe support
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2026 15:00:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260909-lan966x-pci-fdma-v6-7-6f48dab9d671@microchip.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260909-lan966x-pci-fdma-v6-0-6f48dab9d671@microchip.com>

Introduce lan966x_fdma_ops to support different FDMA implementations
for platform and PCIe. Plumb fdma_init, fdma_deinit, fdma_xmit,
fdma_poll and fdma_resize through the ops table, and select the
implementation at probe time. Only the platform implementation exists
at this point; the PCIe implementation is added in a later patch.

Tested-by: Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
---
 .../net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_fdma.c    |  2 +-
 .../net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c    | 20 +++++++++++++++-----
 .../net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.h    | 13 +++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_fdma.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_fdma.c
index 15fc59cb4ad7..2695bc41e52a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_fdma.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_fdma.c
@@ -947,7 +947,7 @@ void lan966x_fdma_netdev_init(struct lan966x *lan966x, struct net_device *dev)
 		return;
 
 	lan966x->fdma_ndev = dev;
-	netif_napi_add(dev, &lan966x->napi, lan966x_fdma_napi_poll);
+	netif_napi_add(dev, &lan966x->napi, lan966x->ops->fdma_poll);
 	napi_enable(&lan966x->napi);
 }
 
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c
index 2741f7c9fa4c..6e6c08bb8eea 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.c
@@ -27,6 +27,14 @@
 
 #define IO_RANGES 2
 
+static const struct lan966x_fdma_ops lan966x_fdma_ops = {
+	.fdma_init = &lan966x_fdma_init,
+	.fdma_deinit = &lan966x_fdma_deinit,
+	.fdma_xmit = &lan966x_fdma_xmit,
+	.fdma_poll = &lan966x_fdma_napi_poll,
+	.fdma_resize = &lan966x_fdma_change_mtu,
+};
+
 static const struct of_device_id lan966x_match[] = {
 	{ .compatible = "microchip,lan966x-switch" },
 	{ }
@@ -392,7 +400,7 @@ static netdev_tx_t lan966x_port_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
 
 	spin_lock(&lan966x->tx_lock);
 	if (port->lan966x->fdma)
-		err = lan966x_fdma_xmit(skb, ifh, dev);
+		err = lan966x->ops->fdma_xmit(skb, ifh, dev);
 	else
 		err = lan966x_port_ifh_xmit(skb, ifh, dev);
 	spin_unlock(&lan966x->tx_lock);
@@ -414,7 +422,7 @@ static int lan966x_port_change_mtu(struct net_device *dev, int new_mtu)
 	if (!lan966x->fdma)
 		return 0;
 
-	err = lan966x_fdma_change_mtu(lan966x);
+	err = lan966x->ops->fdma_resize(lan966x);
 	if (err) {
 		lan_wr(DEV_MAC_MAXLEN_CFG_MAX_LEN_SET(LAN966X_HW_MTU(old_mtu)),
 		       lan966x, DEV_MAC_MAXLEN_CFG(port->chip_port));
@@ -1111,6 +1119,8 @@ static int lan966x_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	lan966x->dev = &pdev->dev;
 	lan966x->dma_dev = lan966x_get_dma_dev(lan966x->dev);
 
+	lan966x->ops = &lan966x_fdma_ops;
+
 	if (!device_get_mac_address(&pdev->dev, mac_addr)) {
 		ether_addr_copy(lan966x->base_mac, mac_addr);
 	} else {
@@ -1250,7 +1260,7 @@ static int lan966x_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (err)
 		goto cleanup_fdb;
 
-	err = lan966x_fdma_init(lan966x);
+	err = lan966x->ops->fdma_init(lan966x);
 	if (err)
 		goto cleanup_ptp;
 
@@ -1263,7 +1273,7 @@ static int lan966x_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	return 0;
 
 cleanup_fdma:
-	lan966x_fdma_deinit(lan966x);
+	lan966x->ops->fdma_deinit(lan966x);
 
 cleanup_ptp:
 	lan966x_ptp_deinit(lan966x);
@@ -1291,7 +1301,7 @@ static void lan966x_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	lan966x_taprio_deinit(lan966x);
 	lan966x_vcap_deinit(lan966x);
-	lan966x_fdma_deinit(lan966x);
+	lan966x->ops->fdma_deinit(lan966x);
 	lan966x_cleanup_ports(lan966x);
 
 	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&lan966x->stats_work);
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.h
index 3f09f8ddf620..aab5e53ed059 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_main.h
@@ -193,6 +193,17 @@ enum vcap_is1_port_sel_rt {
 	VCAP_IS1_PS_RT_FOLLOW_OTHER = 7,
 };
 
+struct lan966x;
+
+struct lan966x_fdma_ops {
+	int (*fdma_init)(struct lan966x *lan966x);
+	void (*fdma_deinit)(struct lan966x *lan966x);
+	int (*fdma_xmit)(struct sk_buff *skb, __be32 *ifh,
+			 struct net_device *dev);
+	int (*fdma_poll)(struct napi_struct *napi, int weight);
+	int (*fdma_resize)(struct lan966x *lan966x);
+};
+
 struct lan966x_port;
 
 struct lan966x_rx {
@@ -273,6 +284,8 @@ struct lan966x {
 	/* Device used for DMA; the PCIe endpoint when enumerated over PCIe. */
 	struct device *dma_dev;
 
+	const struct lan966x_fdma_ops *ops;
+
 	u8 num_phys_ports;
 	struct lan966x_port **ports;
 

-- 
2.34.1



  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-09 13:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-09 13:00 [PATCH net-next v6 00/14] net: lan966x: add support for PCIe FDMA Daniel Machon
2026-09-09 13:00 ` [PATCH net-next v6 01/14] MAINTAINERS: add FDMA library to Sparx5 SoC entry Daniel Machon
2026-09-09 13:00 ` [PATCH net-next v6 02/14] net: microchip: fdma: rename contiguous dataptr helpers Daniel Machon
2026-09-09 13:00 ` [PATCH net-next v6 03/14] net: microchip: fdma: add PCIe ATU support Daniel Machon
2026-09-10 13:05   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-09 13:00 ` [PATCH net-next v6 04/14] net: lan966x: add FDMA LLP register write helper Daniel Machon
2026-09-09 13:00 ` [PATCH net-next v6 05/14] net: lan966x: export FDMA helpers for reuse Daniel Machon
2026-09-09 13:00 ` [PATCH net-next v6 06/14] net: lan966x: use a dedicated device for DMA operations Daniel Machon
2026-09-09 13:00 ` Daniel Machon [this message]
2026-09-09 13:00 ` [PATCH net-next v6 08/14] net: lan966x: clear FDMA interrupt stickies after switch reset Daniel Machon
2026-09-10 13:05   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-09 13:00 ` [PATCH net-next v6 09/14] net: lan966x: add shutdown callback to stop FDMA on reboot Daniel Machon
2026-09-10 13:05   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-09 13:00 ` [PATCH net-next v6 10/14] net: lan966x: add PCIe FDMA support Daniel Machon
2026-09-10 13:05   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-09 13:00 ` [PATCH net-next v6 11/14] net: lan966x: add PCIe FDMA MTU change support Daniel Machon
2026-09-10 13:05   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-09 13:00 ` [PATCH net-next v6 12/14] net: lan966x: add PCIe FDMA XDP support Daniel Machon
2026-09-10 13:05   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-09 13:00 ` [PATCH net-next v6 13/14] misc: lan966x-pci: dts: extend cpu reg to cover PCIE DBI space Daniel Machon
2026-09-10 13:05   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-09 13:00 ` [PATCH net-next v6 14/14] misc: lan966x-pci: dts: add fdma interrupt to overlay Daniel Machon
2026-09-10 13:05   ` netdev-bot+sashiko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260909-lan966x-pci-fdma-v6-7-6f48dab9d671@microchip.com \
    --to=daniel.machon@microchip.com \
    --cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hawk@kernel.org \
    --cc=herve.codina@bootlin.com \
    --cc=horatiu.vultur@microchip.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mohsin.bashr@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=steen.hegelund@microchip.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox