From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: "Semih Baskan" <strst.gs@gmail.com>, "Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>
Cc: lpieralisi@kernel.org, kwilczynski@kernel.org, mani@kernel.org,
robh@kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com, rjui@broadcom.com,
sbranden@broadcom.com, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
rafal@milecki.pl, florian.fainelli@broadcom.com, arnd@arndb.de,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rosenp@gmail.com,
rani.hod@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] PCI: iproc: Use the EROM outbound window on BCMA
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2026 14:14:29 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260911191429.GA549927@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260807160526.379-1-strst.gs@gmail.com>
[+to Rafał; probably same as rafal@milecki.pl, but MAINTAINERS lists
zajec5@gmail.com for BCMA]
On Fri, Aug 07, 2026 at 07:05:26PM +0300, Semih Baskan wrote:
> The PCIe outbound window base on Northstar depends on the PCIe Gen2 core
> revision. Revision 0x01 uses 0x08000000, 0x40000000 and 0x48000000 for
> controllers 0 to 2, while revision 0x07 (NS-B0) uses 0x08000000,
> 0x20000000 and 0x28000000. Broadcom's own driver branches on the core
> revision for exactly this reason.
>
> bcm-ns.dtsi is shared by every Northstar SoC, so it cannot carry a value
> that is correct on both. Commit 767012397976 ("ARM: dts: BCM5301X:
> Describe PCIe controllers fully") gave the controllers a ranges property.
> The commit shipped in v7.1.
>
> With that property present, two things go wrong with this driver:
>
> - devm_pci_alloc_host_bridge() parses those ranges and requests them,
> then this driver adds its own window and requests the whole list a
> second time, so every controller fails to probe with -EBUSY.
>
> - The DT window itself is only correct on core revision 0x07. On
> revision 0x01 it points at an address the hardware does not decode,
> and the first MMIO access to a BAR takes an imprecise external
> abort.
>
> The enumeration ROM reports the correct base for the revision actually
> present, and bcma already provides it as addr_s[0]. Drop any memory
> window that came from the device tree and use that instead, requesting
> only the window this driver owns. This makes the driver correct whether
> or not the DT describes a window.
>
> When a dropped window does not match what the EROM reports, print a
> warning naming both. The mismatch means the devicetree describes a
> window the hardware does not decode, and that should be fixed in the
> dts rather than ignored silently.
>
> The same commit also added compatible = "brcm,iproc-pcie", so these
> nodes now match pcie-iproc-platform. With CONFIG_PCIE_IPROC_PLATFORM
> enabled, which is the default on ARCH_BCM_IPROC, that driver binds them
> first and this driver's probe fails inside devm_pci_alloc_host_bridge().
> This patch fixes the configurations where the BCMA driver is the one in
> use; OpenWrt builds that way, with PCIE_IPROC_PLATFORM disabled. The
> platform path takes the DT window as-is and has the same wrong address
> on core revision 0x01, so that side needs a devicetree fix either way.
>
> Tested on an ASUS RT-N18U (BCM47081) and a Linksys EA9200 (BCM4709),
> both core revision 0x01.
>
> Fixes: 767012397976 ("ARM: dts: BCM5301X: Describe PCIe controllers fully")
> Tested-by: Rani Hod <rani.hod@gmail.com>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v7.1+
> Signed-off-by: Semih Baskan <strst.gs@gmail.com>
> ---
> v2 -> v3: format the two problem descriptions as bullet points.
> Requested by Bjorn Helgaas.
>
> v1 -> v2: print a warning for every devicetree memory window that does
> not match the EROM window. Requested by Arnd Bergmann:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/d05ffeca-f289-42dd-b454-5a7c7741c6d5@app.fastmail.com/
>
> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260807035726.387-1-strst.gs@gmail.com/
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260727140939.389-1-strst.gs@gmail.com/
>
> drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc-bcma.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc-bcma.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc-bcma.c
> index 593418c2b..06a471f4a 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc-bcma.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-iproc-bcma.c
> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ static int iproc_bcma_pcie_probe(struct bcma_device *bdev)
> struct device *dev = &bdev->dev;
> struct iproc_pcie *pcie;
> struct pci_host_bridge *bridge;
> + struct resource_entry *win, *tmp;
> int ret;
>
> bridge = devm_pci_alloc_host_bridge(dev, sizeof(*pcie));
> @@ -59,8 +60,22 @@ static int iproc_bcma_pcie_probe(struct bcma_device *bdev)
> pcie->mem.end = bdev->addr_s[0] + SZ_128M - 1;
> pcie->mem.name = "PCIe MEM space";
> pcie->mem.flags = IORESOURCE_MEM;
> +
> + resource_list_for_each_entry_safe(win, tmp, &bridge->windows) {
> + if (resource_type(win->res) != IORESOURCE_MEM)
> + continue;
> +
> + if (win->res->start != pcie->mem.start ||
> + win->res->end != pcie->mem.end)
> + dev_warn(dev, "DT window %pR does not match EROM window %pR, using EROM\n",
> + win->res, &pcie->mem);
> +
> + devm_release_resource(dev, win->res);
> + resource_list_destroy_entry(win);
> + }
> +
> pci_add_resource(&bridge->windows, &pcie->mem);
> - ret = devm_request_pci_bus_resources(dev, &bridge->windows);
> + ret = devm_request_resource(dev, &iomem_resource, &pcie->mem);
If the EROM supplies the information the driver needs, why does this
BCMA driver use DT at all?
AFAICS, pcie-iproc-bcma.c doesn't use any of the information from DT.
devm_pci_alloc_host_bridge() *looks* in DT, parses it, and fills in
bridge->windows, and requests those windows, but I don't think
iproc-bcma ever uses them.
iproc_bcma_pcie_probe() passes &bridge->windows to iproc_pcie_setup(),
where I think it's ignored because pcie->need_ob_cfg is never set for
iproc_bcma.
It looks like iproc_bcma_pcie_probe() should just call
pci_alloc_host_bridge() directly and skip devm_pci_alloc_host_bridge()
and the DT things it does.
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> --
> 2.43.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-11 19:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-07 16:05 [PATCH v3] PCI: iproc: Use the EROM outbound window on BCMA Semih Baskan
2026-09-10 11:14 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-09-11 19:14 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2026-09-12 4:32 ` Semih Baskan
2026-09-12 4:36 ` [PATCH] PCI: iproc: Use pci_alloc_host_bridge() " Semih Baskan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260911191429.GA549927@bhelgaas \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=florian.fainelli@broadcom.com \
--cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=rafal@milecki.pl \
--cc=rani.hod@gmail.com \
--cc=rjui@broadcom.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=rosenp@gmail.com \
--cc=sbranden@broadcom.com \
--cc=strst.gs@gmail.com \
--cc=zajec5@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox