Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com>
To: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, jim2101024@gmail.com,
	james.quinlan@broadcom.com
Cc: "Florian Fainelli" <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>,
	"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kwilczynski@kernel.org>,
	"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@kernel.org>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org (moderated list:BROADCOM
	BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE),
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org (moderated list:BROADCOM
	BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE),
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)
Subject: [PATCH 12/13] PCI: brcmstb: Use order-0 indexing for inbound BAR window array
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2026 19:35:37 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260911233541.1650895-13-james.quinlan@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260911233541.1650895-1-james.quinlan@broadcom.com>

The register names for the inbound BAR registers use order-1 indexing,
e.g. the first is BAR1.  The code followed this nomenclature by not using
the 0th element of the inbound array.

Undo this approach and use order-0 indexing.  Also use a struct pointer
variable in two functions instead of array indexing.

Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com>
---
 drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c | 49 ++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
index 8bca98e6f5fa..53984cfa2c96 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
@@ -954,8 +954,8 @@ static void add_inbound_win(struct inbound_win *b, u8 *count, u64 size,
 	(*count)++;
 }
 
-static int brcm_pcie_get_inbound_wins(struct brcm_pcie *pcie,
-				      struct inbound_win inbound_wins[])
+static int brcm_pcie_get_ib_wins(struct brcm_pcie *pcie,
+				 struct inbound_win *ib_win)
 {
 	struct pci_host_bridge *bridge = pci_host_bridge_from_priv(pcie);
 	u64 pci_offset, cpu_addr, size = 0, tot_size = 0;
@@ -965,13 +965,6 @@ static int brcm_pcie_get_inbound_wins(struct brcm_pcie *pcie,
 	int ret, i = 0;
 	u8 n = 0;
 
-	/*
-	 * The HW registers (and PCIe) use order-1 numbering for BARs.  As such,
-	 * we have inbound_wins[0] unused and BAR1 starts at inbound_wins[1].
-	 */
-	struct inbound_win *b_begin = &inbound_wins[1];
-	struct inbound_win *b = b_begin;
-
 	/*
 	 * STB chips beside 7712 disable the first inbound window default.
 	 * Rather being mapped to system memory it is mapped to the
@@ -980,7 +973,7 @@ static int brcm_pcie_get_inbound_wins(struct brcm_pcie *pcie,
 	 * SoCs.
 	 */
 	if (pcie->cfg->soc_base != BCM7712)
-		add_inbound_win(b++, &n, 0, 0, 0);
+		add_inbound_win(ib_win++, &n, 0, 0, 0);
 
 	resource_list_for_each_entry(entry, &bridge->dma_ranges) {
 		u64 pcie_start = entry->res->start - entry->offset;
@@ -997,7 +990,7 @@ static int brcm_pcie_get_inbound_wins(struct brcm_pcie *pcie,
 		 * two.
 		 */
 		if (pcie->cfg->soc_base == BCM7712)
-			add_inbound_win(b++, &n, size, cpu_start, pcie_start);
+			add_inbound_win(ib_win++, &n, size, cpu_start, pcie_start);
 
 		if (n > pcie->cfg->num_inbound_wins)
 			break;
@@ -1081,44 +1074,44 @@ static int brcm_pcie_get_inbound_wins(struct brcm_pcie *pcie,
 	}
 
 	/* Enable inbound window 2, the main inbound window for STB chips */
-	add_inbound_win(b++, &n, size, cpu_addr, pci_offset);
+	add_inbound_win(ib_win++, &n, size, cpu_addr, pci_offset);
 
 	/*
 	 * Disable inbound window 3.  On some chips presents the same
 	 * window as #2 but the data appears in a settable endianness.
 	 */
-	add_inbound_win(b++, &n, 0, 0, 0);
+	add_inbound_win(ib_win++, &n, 0, 0, 0);
 
 	return n;
 }
 
 static u32 brcm_bar_reg_offset(int bar)
 {
-	if (bar <= 3)
-		return PCIE_MISC_RC_BAR1_CONFIG_LO + 8 * (bar - 1);
+	if (bar <= 2)
+		return PCIE_MISC_RC_BAR1_CONFIG_LO + 8 * bar;
 	else
-		return PCIE_MISC_RC_BAR4_CONFIG_LO + 8 * (bar - 4);
+		return PCIE_MISC_RC_BAR4_CONFIG_LO + 8 * (bar - 3);
 }
 
 static u32 brcm_ubus_reg_offset(int bar)
 {
-	if (bar <= 3)
-		return PCIE_MISC_UBUS_BAR1_CONFIG_REMAP + 8 * (bar - 1);
+	if (bar <= 2)
+		return PCIE_MISC_UBUS_BAR1_CONFIG_REMAP + 8 * bar;
 	else
-		return PCIE_MISC_UBUS_BAR4_CONFIG_REMAP + 8 * (bar - 4);
+		return PCIE_MISC_UBUS_BAR4_CONFIG_REMAP + 8 * (bar - 3);
 }
 
-static void set_inbound_win_registers(struct brcm_pcie *pcie,
-				      const struct inbound_win *inbound_wins,
-				      u8 num_inbound_wins)
+static void brcm_pcie_set_ib_win_registers(struct brcm_pcie *pcie,
+					   const struct inbound_win *ib_win,
+					   u8 num_inbound_wins)
 {
 	void __iomem *base = pcie->base;
 	int i;
 
-	for (i = 1; i <= num_inbound_wins; i++) {
-		u64 pci_offset = inbound_wins[i].pci_offset;
-		u64 cpu_addr = inbound_wins[i].cpu_addr;
-		u64 size = inbound_wins[i].size;
+	for (i = 0; i < num_inbound_wins; i++, ib_win++) {
+		u64 pci_offset = ib_win->pci_offset;
+		u64 cpu_addr = ib_win->cpu_addr;
+		u64 size = ib_win->size;
 		u32 reg_offset = brcm_bar_reg_offset(i);
 		u32 tmp = lower_32_bits(pci_offset);
 
@@ -1202,11 +1195,11 @@ static int brcm_pcie_setup(struct brcm_pcie *pcie)
 	u32p_replace_bits(&tmp, 1, PCIE_MISC_MISC_CTRL_PCIE_RCB_64B_MODE_MASK);
 	writel(tmp, base + PCIE_MISC_MISC_CTRL);
 
-	num_inbound_wins = brcm_pcie_get_inbound_wins(pcie, inbound_wins);
+	num_inbound_wins = brcm_pcie_get_ib_wins(pcie, inbound_wins);
 	if (num_inbound_wins < 0)
 		return num_inbound_wins;
 
-	set_inbound_win_registers(pcie, inbound_wins, num_inbound_wins);
+	brcm_pcie_set_ib_win_registers(pcie, inbound_wins, num_inbound_wins);
 
 	if (!brcm_pcie_rc_mode(pcie)) {
 		dev_err(pcie->dev, "PCIe RC controller misconfigured as Endpoint\n");
-- 
2.34.1



  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-11 23:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-11 23:35 [PATCH 00/13] PCI: brcmstb: Stop using chip numbers for conditions Jim Quinlan
2026-09-11 23:35 ` [PATCH 01/13] PCI: brcmstb: Remove redundant const specifier for struct fields Jim Quinlan
2026-09-11 23:35 ` [PATCH 02/13] PCI: brcmstb: Use flags u32 instead of bools Jim Quinlan
2026-09-11 23:35 ` [PATCH 03/13] PCI: brcmstb: Add Broadcom quirks macro Jim Quinlan
2026-09-11 23:35 ` [PATCH 04/13] PCI: brcmstb: Declare and assign quirk OB_WIN_32BIT_ADDR Jim Quinlan
2026-09-11 23:35 ` [PATCH 05/13] PCI: brcmstb: Declare and assign quirk OB_WIN_MAXSZ_128MB Jim Quinlan
2026-09-11 23:35 ` [PATCH 06/13] PCI: brcmstb: Declare and assign flag IS_BMIPS Jim Quinlan
2026-09-11 23:35 ` [PATCH 07/13] PCI: brcmstb: Declare and assign quirk 32BIT_PCI_OPS Jim Quinlan
2026-09-11 23:35 ` [PATCH 08/13] PCI: brcmstb: Declare and assign quirk NO_RGR1_TIMER Jim Quinlan
2026-09-11 23:35 ` [PATCH 09/13] PCI: brcmstb: Declare and assign quirk EARLY_PERST_ASSERT Jim Quinlan
2026-09-11 23:35 ` [PATCH 10/13] PCI: brcmstb: Declare and assign quirk PERST_PCIE_REV_CUTOFF Jim Quinlan
2026-09-11 23:35 ` [PATCH 11/13] PCI: brcmstb: Put max_burst_size setting in cfg_data Jim Quinlan
2026-09-11 23:35 ` Jim Quinlan [this message]
2026-09-11 23:35 ` [PATCH 13/13] PCI: brcmstb: Split up complicated function into two variants Jim Quinlan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260911233541.1650895-13-james.quinlan@broadcom.com \
    --to=james.quinlan@broadcom.com \
    --cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=florian.fainelli@broadcom.com \
    --cc=jim2101024@gmail.com \
    --cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=mani@kernel.org \
    --cc=nsaenz@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox