From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AC90C88E50 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2026 08:13:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=Q7ra92S2TxTnRNeXWfAmnmJxMYA9//0DIsg+DFwp27U=; b=rXQm4i9ENTx0SCTQy4H7ecSrGM DsLHng53KnB+KVGJZNs5FlQLqUiQp+gCD9+ef/J5p6dZApwa4Vv5pd7pTqMv+FCZc5Hv5+zELpwat EBSFe5TEyftmwM+MKFxF5MhrWVZn3AlGjneiHqB3FF/rVjFrTDDAkWG3LYKp1mDwVmtJS69zyaX0D YTZdEl+LOAA7XNx9LegGYP79bQbwClIS7NrJt6B3AzfL3H2hiLAEU8WpU60Y0+ALRbiTXflIlZ+uU YfpSKnXRoeZZLjkxOQUKCM5Y+XKovw8+qWvAbtVNdY2ch6RyS8C+R95AsGLtfvZLE5wrMYx9+W4LO klZR/7kg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1x61p2-00000002gjO-0l4e; Mon, 14 Sep 2026 08:13:52 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1x61oz-00000002gi8-2cnW for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2026 08:13:50 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 294771570; Mon, 14 Sep 2026 01:13:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.2.196.114]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 65B693F7B4; Mon, 14 Sep 2026 01:13:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=arm.com; s=foss; t=1789373625; bh=IUx9npSbM6aOGbT981H4LjgrA0kKmEs/fDvfjpfynoU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Ie0F5Yrzn4+JUTJXdJ59qKHeSnntkVs/evhaYFzCMI5fXmKYH+ALw+LAaNOIZflIx cchmn6Qw7oauzbwstdIZIrMFDU5g5YkP0LZS323YQUWkpNicFH6hRlQqRd42sDydXD VqDiywdnOT+pXi0AJXMsRgbNU6Aemrf8+CG/mmpE= Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2026 09:13:43 +0100 From: Leo Yan To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: James Clark , Suzuki K Poulose , Mike Leach , John Garry , Will Deacon , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Namhyung Kim , Mark Rutland , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Ian Rogers , Adrian Hunter , Mathieu Poirier , Jonathan Corbet , Shuah Khan , Suyash Mahar , Leo Yan , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, coresight@lists.linaro.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] perf cs-etm: Per-thread mode fixes and snapshot wrap support Message-ID: <20260914081343.GF200420@e132581.arm.com> References: <20260811-james-cs-unformatted-per-thread-fix-v1-0-90565318f5f8@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.9.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20260914_011349_701145_F4319B6C X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.01 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Arnaldo, On Sun, Sep 13, 2026 at 10:20:31PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > On Tue, Aug 11, 2026 at 04:30:03PM +0100, James Clark wrote: > > Fix a few issues with per-thread mode: > > - With TRBE, thread migrations hit a queue without a decoder assert > > - On nVHE, everything looks like guest trace instead of host > > - Tracing multiple threads didn't really work > > This series applies cleanly to perf-tools-next but has no Reviewed-by > nor was processed by Sashiko. > > Can somebody from the ARM camp take a look at it, please? James has sent v2 [1] and I gave some words on it. Adrian also has one comment for snapshot callbacks refactoring. Sashiko also sent out review on the series. Thanks, Leo [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/20260821-james-cs-unformatted-per-thread-fix-v2-0-00c4fd0701b4@linaro.org/