From: Jaidev Shastri via B4 Relay <devnull+jaidevshastri.vt.edu@kernel.org>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@kernel.org>,
Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jaidev Shastri <jaidevshastri@vt.edu>
Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: scmi: publish perf_ops with release semantics
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2026 21:19:01 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260921-mb-scmi-cpufreq-v1-1-934da6400a26@vt.edu> (raw)
From: Jaidev Shastri <jaidevshastri@vt.edu>
scmi_cpufreq_probe() stores the SCMI performance protocol ops pointer to
the file-scope perf_ops with a plain store and then registers the
cpufreq driver. The callbacks read perf_ops with plain loads, starting
with scmi_cpufreq_init() on whichever CPU brings up a policy.
Keep the pointer in a local, publish it with smp_store_release() and
read it with smp_load_acquire() in scmi_cpufreq_init(), the first
callback invoked for a policy.
Found with MBCheck, a static herd7-based memory consistency checker.
Signed-off-by: Jaidev Shastri <jaidevshastri@vt.edu>
---
drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c
index 4edb4f7a8..c394f63cc 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c
@@ -197,6 +197,8 @@ static int scmi_limit_notify_cb(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long event,
static int scmi_cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
+ /* Pairs with the smp_store_release() in scmi_cpufreq_probe(). */
+ const struct scmi_perf_proto_ops *ops = smp_load_acquire(&perf_ops);
int ret, nr_opp, domain;
unsigned int latency;
struct device *cpu_dev;
@@ -252,7 +254,7 @@ static int scmi_cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
*/
nr_opp = dev_pm_opp_get_opp_count(cpu_dev);
if (nr_opp <= 0) {
- ret = perf_ops->device_opps_add(ph, cpu_dev, domain);
+ ret = ops->device_opps_add(ph, cpu_dev, domain);
if (ret) {
dev_warn(cpu_dev, "failed to add opps to the device\n");
goto out_free_cpumask;
@@ -293,14 +295,14 @@ static int scmi_cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
/* SCMI allows DVFS request for any domain from any CPU */
policy->dvfs_possible_from_any_cpu = true;
- latency = perf_ops->transition_latency_get(ph, domain);
+ latency = ops->transition_latency_get(ph, domain);
if (!latency)
latency = CPUFREQ_DEFAULT_TRANSITION_LATENCY_NS;
policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = latency;
policy->fast_switch_possible =
- perf_ops->fast_switch_possible(ph, domain);
+ ops->fast_switch_possible(ph, domain);
policy->transition_delay_us =
scmi_get_rate_limit(domain, policy->fast_switch_possible);
@@ -443,6 +445,7 @@ static int scmi_cpufreq_probe(struct scmi_device *sdev)
int ret;
struct device *dev = &sdev->dev;
const struct scmi_handle *handle;
+ const struct scmi_perf_proto_ops *ops;
handle = sdev->handle;
@@ -451,9 +454,15 @@ static int scmi_cpufreq_probe(struct scmi_device *sdev)
scmi_cpufreq_driver.driver_data = sdev;
- perf_ops = handle->devm_protocol_get(sdev, SCMI_PROTOCOL_PERF, &ph);
- if (IS_ERR(perf_ops))
- return PTR_ERR(perf_ops);
+ ops = handle->devm_protocol_get(sdev, SCMI_PROTOCOL_PERF, &ph);
+ if (IS_ERR(ops))
+ return PTR_ERR(ops);
+ /*
+ * The cpufreq callbacks read perf_ops after cpufreq_register_driver()
+ * below. Publish it with release semantics so that ph and the ops are
+ * visible together.
+ */
+ smp_store_release(&perf_ops, ops);
#ifdef CONFIG_COMMON_CLK
/* dummy clock provider as needed by OPP if clocks property is used */
---
base-commit: 93f51579e7df248780214094418f205253383cc5
change-id: 20260921-mb-scmi-cpufreq-cabfeb548027
Best regards,
--
Jaidev Shastri <jaidevshastri@vt.edu>
next reply other threads:[~2026-09-22 1:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-22 1:19 Jaidev Shastri via B4 Relay [this message]
2026-09-22 4:26 ` [PATCH] cpufreq: scmi: publish perf_ops with release semantics Zhongqiu Han
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260921-mb-scmi-cpufreq-v1-1-934da6400a26@vt.edu \
--to=devnull+jaidevshastri.vt.edu@kernel.org \
--cc=arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
--cc=jaidevshastri@vt.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@kernel.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox