From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72806C982DA for ; Sun, 20 Sep 2026 23:17:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To: From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=iNmqXhGZZ3SwaOV8bqOvV8+pT+SPZVFh4wF6oc2IRlM=; b=bMPJ8FK/a0vVGf9aCs9svsgUfs mp4bo5QoFM4VQaR03roz5etsEL31+9euOgt1/FF6FlBPXelg4uf+2z923TMmNeJ3AIX03IAgCk5iK HqygdpLa9b6hxySTchRaTEoF6miNtfrwYgDZh1R9pwAFJFme5F9LbOBjqQRIaI2cgiy9ub7zkP6a1 pImEie5c6zQ1i3HexLNN+9suSQvq1tEgB359uG57PzDfwpDi+sqZ5u6ARqp9izrbcLt+WdNO3mCTZ BxHkFpx3dL+HuxPvN58CuzjPbWWZolmqaQLlUGzn3FtI/pjvw4SxgQ2jwg7Tri7RUQU2LY1A0qW5p NdfVWjaQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1x8QmV-00000000a8P-1w3J; Sun, 20 Sep 2026 23:17:11 +0000 Received: from tor.source.kernel.org ([172.105.4.254]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1x8QmU-00000000a8E-4B4w; Sun, 20 Sep 2026 23:17:11 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C55F9601F0; Sun, 20 Sep 2026 23:17:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A394B1F000FF; Sun, 20 Sep 2026 23:17:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1789946229; bh=iNmqXhGZZ3SwaOV8bqOvV8+pT+SPZVFh4wF6oc2IRlM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=KXchSqOMRu6y0GF6EJYza2QP88aCzZmwup1XUPGrasdEXOhI6G7OJ14iaK1CWpkJs yqDplcxA/MrOg7wIZwopBhu4eSf0x2hW43ePFgdnb1T8ZMGX4KBu4ZJhbq905a+M2B /QZq8nTfycPwGGIPWRLsEmzwrLZwV0Mx2erm3tVKNSXQuHaPkO0J4Bk/KhqqPUr36b LQQTXQ+wRVrHLNYaYL5uxJlfha8588V9Hp1xwdIzVyqQGtskhuqi/Fwt0mI8+W6MiC nyvSs8D9Mn/PNqMjBa9q4p3DN9FDOlq1/cC3K9rnEI+ARfCKV/s3bGi8ip+Wjn8cPq k9TKIz31I3z4A== Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2026 00:17:02 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Ryan Brue Cc: David Lechner , Nuno =?UTF-8?B?U8Oh?= , Andy Shevchenko , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Matthias Brugger , AngeloGioacchino Del Regno , Lee Jones , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, mfd@lists.linux.dev, Roman Vivchar , Luca Leonardo Scorcia , Andy Shevchenko Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] iio: adc: add mt6397 PMIC AUXADC support Message-ID: <20260921001702.3a208780@jic23-hlaptop> In-Reply-To: <20260920-rbrue-suez-upstreaming-mt6397-auxadc-v3-0-c00edacbee64@gmail.com> References: <20260920-rbrue-suez-upstreaming-mt6397-auxadc-v3-0-c00edacbee64@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.4.0 (GTK 3.24.52; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Sun, 20 Sep 2026 00:31:50 -0500 Ryan Brue wrote: > The MediaTek mt6397 PMIC has a 10-bit AUXADC that nothing in-tree can > reach. On boards built around it that ADC is the only path to the battery: > the SoC's AUXADC is wired to board thermistors, and the charger ICs these > boards use have no ADC at all, so without it there is no pack voltage and > no state of charge. Hi Ryan, Please slow down between new versions. Unless a maintainer is specifically asking for a quick turn around (sometimes happen very late in a series) at least a week is typical time to allow multiple reviews to come in and hence save on effort all round. Jonathan