From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22E8CC982ED for ; Mon, 21 Sep 2026 20:59:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To: From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=yPlV0TdnCTuH8vfvhnR/rAYRlqQVlX7OjVUEqZ0RXs4=; b=HsBP1tmhcxiKIC6Z2425o4HW8C iFoTfu6RetPZu2EuvyQVlCQ2wi9Ky9lWOWjYECKnHKMR6tWfJH85gF389/6FWFBE9+KJMKxeOuYON MT4ACrdkEso3jVBN/PdgaSwzYuNxOl8tE6/ZlecmiV+kDKRmPSd2XuoGUPBNs3FbToOVuUtWmoy17 HG/E8UMm5cis/hAxA2hStXYBR/E1nBZvTz0prcEkHMWA4YBlQJNW8VaJgKf5sP8XPMop2Li6BRKJH 9XZaRJnm4d1NqlUllHEF8NGN16850QnDGk5REj+8YpARlxNNlwQfDfDPJO/PIXOlPWJG5FJTGnKUS YpJPt5WA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1x8l6v-00000003PPD-3keo; Mon, 21 Sep 2026 20:59:37 +0000 Received: from tor.source.kernel.org ([2600:3c04:e001:324:0:1991:8:25]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1x8l6u-00000003POj-1UBO; Mon, 21 Sep 2026 20:59:36 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6509F60008; Mon, 21 Sep 2026 20:59:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5056D1F000FF; Mon, 21 Sep 2026 20:59:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790024375; bh=yPlV0TdnCTuH8vfvhnR/rAYRlqQVlX7OjVUEqZ0RXs4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=Oa8RQ9a7JeDDYSLc9Gu6ElBfI55EIEWZCl0XXhIvLnkx/PsbHR8FUA7cbI4+JMOlo BCXpIxl+mgv2W6OOw/MjR3dcAQkoEj5pHbX5ozf8bFB4ASlt9brFAfwrQ7HvCeJg1i H6gU7R5+l9l8foq8FWwNQ+Fq7EOTq/9/KJbt2pPTz8yt+x7ekWsTpEtM3CGZSRmgtM NR34unzMDglHo4oaSzutRTkCfekeJ4e8k8sQEKlOOcaFKNJlAynAgaKDayG7gBPqhN ESVQ8NaZWqlqNNM7hfC1Zj/EYWSMrMI5UDxUyCXRuNzXr1dqDvt4tqPPEisVGLNF1P /DrimOFamdqHw== Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2026 13:59:33 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Christian Marangi Cc: Maxime Chevallier , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Simon Horman , Jonathan Corbet , Shuah Khan , Randy Dunlap , Lorenzo Bianconi , Heiner Kallweit , Russell King , Philipp Zabel , Nathan Chancellor , Nick Desaulniers , Bill Wendling , Justin Stitt , netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v16 00/12] net: pcs: Introduce support for fwnode PCS Message-ID: <20260921135933.7e8857ba@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20260916235200.20712-1-ansuelsmth@gmail.com> References: <20260916235200.20712-1-ansuelsmth@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, 17 Sep 2026 01:51:26 +0200 Christian Marangi wrote: > This series introduce a most awaited feature that is correctly > provide PCS with fwnode without having to use specific export symbol > and additional handling of PCS in phylink. > > At times there were 2 different implementation (this and the one > from Sean) but Sean agreed that this can be picked and used in favor > of his implementation as long as his case with race condition is > correctly handled. Looks like the review for one of the patches failed so it won't be emailed out: https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260916235200.20712-2-ansuelsmth@gmail.com Are all of the issues invalid? Once the AI review is cleared, some human will have to review this and vouch for you as a maintainer. Better still be your co-maintainer.