From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5CFEC982FA for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2026 12:16:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=JIYSRvzS+lTZK1y1XxDKW9rrYSsqjNnfXKv1cTCBldM=; b=ha8hLe0y3e6MH7O95NuH3MqBqr fFwe2ZqkAXTQXjkt6q+j8fUizLrzqNFoej02tALTMOsEszMeALi90l2xT++tbM23xhpuk9guUxBvX ou1iPqoFROWbDJG1Zp2dn9BAmjU5ib1kwwOfzTI95FXmq9+Cq3ZWxUWHdPO4d8TcZm/L5h7iXS3lA yjC9WZiRRJLehSpleIFl8qtFF+yeHYdFgD8a1HPXGJPbHsKJLslyA1gn1bApEmtrMOsJNZW8i4Pfz v3+UqzPQBLZEV4GEBIRgwjMiKFWxpKg8CYFWYJjF3TqflyxpeHcK00DVpDUDMLMOF9lb0sYvZyaUH C+bB+6Uw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1x8zPe-00000005Hbh-2g1T; Tue, 22 Sep 2026 12:15:54 +0000 Received: from sea.source.kernel.org ([2600:3c0a:e001:78e:0:1991:8:25]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1x8zPd-00000005HbU-2P4F for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2026 12:15:53 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) by sea.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F05441600; Tue, 22 Sep 2026 12:15:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5A9C51F00893; Tue, 22 Sep 2026 12:15:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790079352; bh=JIYSRvzS+lTZK1y1XxDKW9rrYSsqjNnfXKv1cTCBldM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=fj4Nz8fBrlIMtPAwuvyzWYgk2LXF8Lpt0kYzJikISSS2f0gxq5cu91MkPgMyWhjmi TYz4m2gkgQqLrmbKjfBYcSmLKtH9wodN2/Y73RJQFK/57b5LQAdtG2hb2KfS+yWqCf uNGH+Od6166rVnHDSiH0YgzkLIKrgic57G4b6NwkebXfJEq90QcRbBTIoiN+jCNjab YExQKEHAAB7yOuSq+JSzzcGGcPv8ESaG5JOBvLB4k0H0oXfFsb46GRQRjewGO8R2SG 3PR5daWjK6PZ94j72UK/IRJGiA/l4632P8gg4blm110z9uU7grk6wVndtuhCAc7xSE 9eHOmJN2e4u4g== Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 13:15:48 +0100 From: Sudeep Holla To: Snehal Koukuntla Cc: Marc Zyngier , Oliver Upton , Catalin Marinas , Sudeep Holla , Will Deacon , Vincent Donnefort , Fuad Tabba , Joey Gouly , Suzuki K Poulose , Mark Rutland , Sebastian Ene , Mostafa Saleh , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] firmware: arm_ffa: Add FFA_FN64_MEM_RECLAIM2 function ID Message-ID: <20260922-chubby-cicada-of-exercise-bbb429@sudeepholla> References: <20260921164748.2958578-1-snehalreddy@google.com> <20260921164748.2958578-2-snehalreddy@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260921164748.2958578-2-snehalreddy@google.com> X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Sep 21, 2026 at 04:47:47PM +0000, Snehal Koukuntla wrote: > FF-A v1.3 ALP5 (DEN0140 rev J) introduces the optional FFA_MEM_RECLAIM2 > (0xC4000091) ABI, which enables an Owner to reclaim exclusive access to > a subset of pages of a memory region without requiring the Relayer to > maintain intermediate transaction state. > > Add the FFA_FN64_MEM_RECLAIM2 function ID definition to arm_ffa.h. > Since the spec is still at ALPHA, I suggest to add RFC in the subject if you post newer version so that it is *NOT* considered for merging until spec reaches *BETA*. -- Regards, Sudeep