On Sun, Sep 20, 2026 at 01:15:01PM +0800, Jelly Jia wrote:
> Hi Conor,
> 
> Thanks, understood: with the SoC-specific compatible scoping the
> integration code, other platforms are unaffected either way.
> 
> For v2 my preference is to keep the wrapper, since it leaves the
> generic arm-dma350 driver and its binding untouched. Does that work
> for you, or would you rather see the dma-350 node itself carry a
> device-specific compatible, with the clocks, resets and
> memory-region described on it? I'd also like Robin's take on the
> arm-dma350 side before restructuring that far.

The latter, since that's what we do for almost every other device under
the sun. Robin's take would probably be worth hearing, but you removed
all the context while replying which makes that more difficult...

> 
> Best regards,
> Jelly