From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97956C9830D for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2026 02:42:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To: From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=P7XbvKMmH4XnJA95W4aG0uSGr8///oHvo/2Qv5ZMyiU=; b=cHywZH1RnrQOtO7fLh/vA5CAlv CcjRWyxZEUk7A/8ePwWdMmCRQrHeSIX2VRgimtzvW9Xpk4gsa4tcp+vc8MgL36jmfUW0rX9414d/V e9n3i7fq7HFWeUULjh1xNsn6BiiM94nvU2hUvA3U990jl9f8UyHGpxnFWl/YqRzVEHKGig/8QW4UW 0IrN/JglYrxEwliZiiIqRG1ncBwAOeUvxPNo9CbBQBC56igSXVACegdG9JEhwpRtfoPQxEKE3PKC2 UXal713R6+CrP8fuTV0sf0stMPcBToLRugt7jAMBCyJ1wEhMo3p3mVzrUSKysELeGg9m+yvrOuQ7/ Vgrpkrhg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1x9ZPO-00000009tEQ-2cHo; Thu, 24 Sep 2026 02:42:02 +0000 Received: from sea.source.kernel.org ([172.234.252.31]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1x9ZPN-00000009tE7-3XYl; Thu, 24 Sep 2026 02:42:01 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) by sea.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 351514477E; Thu, 24 Sep 2026 02:42:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A997F1F000FF; Thu, 24 Sep 2026 02:42:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790217721; bh=P7XbvKMmH4XnJA95W4aG0uSGr8///oHvo/2Qv5ZMyiU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=WveTC055i44OVEekAgscWWLflsQOelAgdxtNP/NTaT32BdM+0OstwmnjCzdYK1E7G XrNGV8/fKf2Q6FcAIJLf1rnMOOOWDF/r96RKmAluv4DtyBEXIgpGCmN2u6oU+aRxUR Yq+QJl1q46SCavln5tnf3wqKmucY9y+WGV/J9UwpZoCMU6eF3fiQ38EfefCOfc++mw SLkigPAhD+tPr9U4l9NyeVBTU8wXIeqtRsY1yrSOogEGuG680yYG+GkCXQ0LXqLPHY QY9iujeeRWYFdp8mCpoU2xPY50FyCOeRicKWTViphqts560LMCQNSIzyZPmE6R7iDs 3lLmd8vtZ5Q+Q== Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2026 19:41:59 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org Cc: yangshiji66@outlook.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, nbd@nbd.name, lorenzo@kernel.org, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, matthias.bgg@gmail.com, angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [net PATCH] net: ethernet: mediatek: only enable WED for ARM64 architecture Message-ID: <20260923194159.264ca04b@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <179009659284.2160803.2402786454793152027@kernel.org> References: <179009659284.2160803.2402786454793152027@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, 22 Sep 2026 17:03:12 +0000 netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org wrote: > Is the Fixes: tag appropriate here? The changelog does not describe a > defect, only a hardware-scope observation and a prediction: > > Currently, only MT7622 and MT798x SoCs support WED features. They > are all ARM64 platforms. And it is unlikely that MediaTek will > release a new net chip based on ARM32 architecture in the future. > > As far as I can tell nothing misbehaves on 32-bit today. Not just the fixes tag, the whole commit seems rather pointless. -- pw-bot: reject