From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28BC5CA5FF5 for ; Mon, 5 Oct 2026 20:58:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To: From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=NNpKODSv8cbaDOfghRaj6Q3Wssu5+yBBdBSPkeZOgVA=; b=hZP38iHetPeDxMxgbhF6qWBApz HpCcjFNThqDPt5iaP1D2T6KNxUdrBbjv9G4/Sso0OVQTKCVnjCo4Sxt+4seZZ2SaYwDxWW/9EWeu0 3gQ8qw4SQS2P/G+5nOBRaBy8ky4l3AJ6llee7Hdce6fp3n/XkJki2UWi6Tj0MDB657nWOAqfJNhhH GSFq/jdpm5qtsXCCVUP2Wy3eEeeG1/2b1Jzxpvl6mjeZoMmam9VYqQjL9W1ynMNqDODZqMQ4rNizd m/pJIBv2k2W8x9tbICKGs+oJ9O2KHzBFr1a2jK62gB/t5ftEeIpnjmORbby1tGCw7ied8ZIZVs78B gm+ED8Aw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1xDplc-0000000HAIQ-35HH; Mon, 05 Oct 2026 20:58:36 +0000 Received: from sea.source.kernel.org ([172.234.252.31]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1xDplb-0000000HAIB-3qb2; Mon, 05 Oct 2026 20:58:35 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) by sea.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24D3D42A2B; Mon, 5 Oct 2026 20:58:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2B8951F000FF; Mon, 5 Oct 2026 20:58:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1791233915; bh=NNpKODSv8cbaDOfghRaj6Q3Wssu5+yBBdBSPkeZOgVA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=JWJmXdjvkJLsj4FzNwydM9W+G7D089NS9WmoDLl4jIQZ2o6K2BRfhjIs62fp3ry9g UtJg52BTRl368jxhDo0m/9gkQQ4iIZP8fpWEePEufdmCKmcpIdGF4wn2rjggtVXfFk 0ozyafbkSWKH5tmB4AgtCFh1EU7fy1f91mAXCU2GQq9blUH2RPRPtirhEz8kQLf5fF 8xLnRUpvu7sURoXENvhZPrh8NY5fDYOZ3xKhC3On/+MUMNZFZwXTpXFUDBVDctIQja TIr5pzqBDgyJQxZuBtTgX1zAo9cPwgU3jlYdtQcENO29cvv2zLcuduYu0epu3gp5qQ 2RpBMcjCD2UlA== Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2026 13:58:33 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Coia Prant Cc: Andrew Lunn , "David S . Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Heiko Stuebner , Vinod Koul , Maxime Chevallier , Maxime Coquelin , Alexandre Torgue , Lad Prabhakar , Romain Gantois , Heiner Kallweit , Neil Armstrong , Russell King , Shawn Lin , David Heidelberg , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v10 00/11] net: pcs: add basic support for RK3568 XPCS Message-ID: <20261005135833.37376f20@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20260922200336.2201212-1-coiaprant@gmail.com> References: <20260922200336.2201212-1-coiaprant@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, 23 Sep 2026 04:03:24 +0800 Coia Prant wrote: > This series adds proper SGMII support for the Rockchip RK3568 SoC > using the integrated Synopsys DesignWare XPCS, along with necessary > fixes and refactoring in the stmmac core and XPCS driver. Someone marked this as changes requested. Not sure who and why. I was waiting for an ack from DT maintainers. If it wasn't you, either, maybe repost to re-queue this for review?