From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Sagi Maimon <maimon.sagi@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, radhey.shyam.pandey@amd.com,
michal.simek@amd.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
daniel@iogearbox.net, jacob.e.keller@intel.com, joe@dama.to,
suraj.gupta2@amd.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v4] net: axienet: free outstanding TX buffers in axienet_dma_bd_release()
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2026 19:57:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261014185716.GD83879@horms.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261007034620.1360542-1-maimon.sagi@gmail.com>
On Wed, Oct 07, 2026 at 06:46:20AM +0300, Sagi Maimon wrote:
> axienet_dma_bd_release() walks the RX ring to unmap and free every
> receive buffer before releasing it, but frees the TX descriptor ring
> with dma_free_coherent() alone. Any descriptor that
> axienet_free_tx_chain() had not yet reclaimed still holds its skb and
> its streaming DMA mapping, and both are lost.
>
> axienet_stop() disables TX NAPI and stops the DMA engine before calling
> it, so nothing reclaims those descriptors afterwards. Bringing the
> interface down while frames are in flight therefore leaks up to
> lp->tx_bd_num skbs and mappings each time.
>
> axienet_dma_err_handler() already walks the TX ring this way before it
> restarts the DMA engine: it unmaps every descriptor whose cntrl is still
> set - axienet_free_tx_chain() clears it on reclaim - frees any skb still
> attached, and clears the descriptor. Move that loop into a helper,
> axienet_free_tx_bufs(), and call it from axienet_dma_bd_release() too.
> This relies on axienet_stop() having stopped the DMA engine first, as
> the RX walk in the same function already does. The helper frees the
> skbs with dev_kfree_skb_any(), as drops: in the error handler, which
> runs from a workqueue, that frees them directly rather than deferring
> them to softirq as dev_kfree_skb_irq() did.
>
> The walk must not run on a ring that is not there. axienet_open() does
> not check the result of the reset that runs axienet_dma_bd_init(), so
> when that reset fails tx_bd_v is either still NULL or, after an earlier
> close, points at the ring that close freed. Clear tx_bd_v and rx_bd_v
> once their rings are freed, and skip the walk when tx_bd_v is NULL.
> That also ends the second dma_free_coherent() of a stale ring which the
> same path already did. On the axienet_dma_bd_init() error path the TX
> ring has just been allocated zeroed, so the walk does nothing.
>
> This was reported by the Sashiko AI review bot.
>
> Tested on the AXI Ethernet MAC of an ADVA TimeCard X2 (PCIe card, with
> the built-in AXI DMA): traffic passes, and after each of ten down/up
> cycles and five module reloads, all made with traffic running and each
> running axienet_dma_bd_release(), traffic resumes and nothing is logged.
> The leak itself was not measured, and neither the failed-reset paths nor
> axienet_dma_err_handler() were exercised.
>
> Fixes: 8a3b7a252dca ("drivers/net/ethernet/xilinx: added Xilinx AXI Ethernet driver")
> Reviewed-by: Joe Damato <joe@dama.to>
> Assisted-by: LLM sparse
> Signed-off-by: Sagi Maimon <maimon.sagi@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
In future please post new patch revisions as new email threads,
not as a reply to an earlier revision.
Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-14 18:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-04 8:37 [PATCH net v3] net: axienet: free outstanding TX buffers in axienet_dma_bd_release() Sagi Maimon
2026-10-05 23:41 ` Joe Damato
2026-10-06 3:44 ` Sagi Maimon
2026-10-07 1:02 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-10-11 8:46 ` Daniel Machon
2026-10-15 7:35 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-10-15 8:03 ` Daniel Machon
2026-10-07 3:46 ` [PATCH net v4] " Sagi Maimon
2026-10-08 15:47 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-11 5:00 ` Sagi Maimon
2026-10-14 18:57 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2026-10-15 7:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261014185716.GD83879@horms.kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=joe@dama.to \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maimon.sagi@gmail.com \
--cc=michal.simek@amd.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=radhey.shyam.pandey@amd.com \
--cc=suraj.gupta2@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox