From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C510606A326 for ; Tue, 3 Nov 2026 11:46:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=bombadil.20210309 header.b=NZCpAdVh; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=XBPDSV6U DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Unsubscribe-Post:List-Owner; bh=rQNgYgRzwbgahGLohNvZBfs82BLnKvw2G9BPFntd+2Y=; b=NZCpAdVhOnJwsAvBqKjsTwldyB ASfI5j2NtNRS8NcVv49A9qi/ja2eZoLY/PlpFl9GV3vm/MP2nlOUsQpe8MAiXe//t2LEa7EhmkebV kQkFy4S/lGH/4nX1xlNdenX64vmtHMjA1R8rakPYVaEmyoKpF4zp4SZQd13XP8xc8di1YJna8aDG4 4SPIPx0pcWZCn5eumlEKTH+9nz3e292F1LBwpnuAi3K7iNxwZEPJp328QUY0v0Zk0elOpbajex4Kg XgBapKAOV643jvKl62UPP/YWJP04ikeSk8cwB5kAQ0w61Due9Fd0GgbSlXnveNvS1bLo0gkMzmHcE wLsi8kiA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.100.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1xOCy9-00000002FuU-19yk; Tue, 03 Nov 2026 11:46:25 +0000 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.100.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1xOCy6-00000002FsQ-1uKG; Tue, 03 Nov 2026 11:46:23 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (m0353729.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.18.1.11/8.18.1.11) with ESMTP id 6A3AEnqC4045893; Tue, 3 Nov 2026 11:45:58 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=cc :content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to; s=pp1; bh=rQNgYgRzwbgahGLohNvZBfs82BLnKv w2G9BPFntd+2Y=; b=XBPDSV6U1ByAfT/2HXWiYPBImtoE06l1RsLvOPr+Mg1Wdg 5bb7Q4UvH0mEeFRj51IZNVX9NifoIpA9L056gpcpDJYHk5VjyO/RQmX944rPTcqT lza8DMAA2sFbSnKXHJIeLKs+Q8G1+3X9B+dEQMrLtkOkjp4pNJTbzJPAiDcZXVUE p6Db6wAKv27p8hT6TDeMeXOr4Vk2Xpp7upRB50EYJzqoLgx5W9PMpVDKF0KnA/eX bnd0mHKF4Ty7FsZMzKSxZD1WU4h6XYV6jH6M4KptIOxivjveMfPtf8UA4FEmQ1NM hLDM5ogor5Zfi+YhNntcsukL5xZcXKcEJ/fYDveQ== Received: from ppma12.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (dc.9e.1632.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [50.22.158.220]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 4hn80snd8h-1 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 03 Nov 2026 11:45:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pps.filterd (ppma12.dal12v.mail.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma12.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (8.18.1.11/8.18.1.11) with ESMTP id 6A3AK5Iq2350043; Tue, 3 Nov 2026 11:45:56 GMT Received: from smtprelay04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.228]) by ppma12.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 4hqbqk8stp-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 03 Nov 2026 11:45:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav03.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav03.fra02v.mail.ibm.com [10.20.54.102]) by smtprelay04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 6A3BjoS127460120 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 3 Nov 2026 11:45:50 GMT Received: from smtpav03.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 770852004D; Tue, 3 Nov 2026 11:45:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav03.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A1B320040; Tue, 3 Nov 2026 11:45:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from osiris (unknown [9.111.24.158]) by smtpav03.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Tue, 3 Nov 2026 11:45:49 +0000 (GMT) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2026 12:45:48 +0100 From: Steffen Eiden To: Sean Christopherson Cc: Marc Zyngier , Oliver Upton , Tianrui Zhao , Bibo Mao , Huacai Chen , Madhavan Srinivasan , Anup Patel , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Paolo Bonzini , Fuad Tabba , Joey Gouly , Suzuki K Poulose , Zenghui Yu , Nicholas Piggin , Atish Patra , Alexandre Ghiti , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Stefan Teodorescu Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] KVM: s390: Drop unused and unreachable kvm_arch_vcpu_should_kick() Message-ID: <20261103114548.119911-B-seiden@linux.ibm.com> References: <20261028190259.1819571-1-seanjc@google.com> <20261028190259.1819571-2-seanjc@google.com> <20261102153228.240804-H-seiden@linux.ibm.com> X-Archived-By: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Reinject: loops=2 maxloops=12 X-Proofpoint-GUID: pVpgdP1XGIbnstN6hf1_H30Mry2kEc8w X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: l9khr2_nw7GEkBcFn3H6-NSEwUfuIP0C X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details-Enc: AW1haW4tMjYxMTAzMDA0NiBTYWx0ZWRfX1XmGS9lHsUL0 R/pqFn7OS4O6sIvO6xkJJLw7ub5XYBJJ8rT4n7ytkLsrM+nXxJ8ALAk6IZ7cxaLgxzx/sz6YekU QUQNLzCc+AcEIzFSIIId4SI+3jZ4xWcemIVFHv+lYM846eTlTDBy/sVfsO3lwE4suzbkGudS2Kb gxPBGGgvMaIVdytp/A39MMoe5QDoT7CkGj5SGrkaqTAe4eTeD+SzsmTdUt/UyjY9TJC3JseqnJa QEo75BJzfvgqw3u+U+2wRBpyO7uPflzaZ5caj2HokpnoTurGkxzXBgpUXpjVDxTHjuBmXjI8rPa vxWDAmBlV9AhIXjL/sn+6LcGLT5sIIA/1vfGnxBH9hGUn2tSE9JXdCrUFdxql4RE+ZLXgJZ4H1I Kt9BEBx2jKRF/wavIUPm0bKdaAiukt/xqjNHAoSCxYurQjxD+KTis8S/8SmPNJktwNxtQkMBgIp 7SZvF2lkFSgtvQ77a7g== X-Proofpoint-Spam-Info: AW1haW4tMjYxMTAzMDA0NiBTYWx0ZWRfX8KXTgj3ZDXIb rszJKiaYCEhjwddi22AWOUixDabzaYbTZeZqW4OyLHY9z/7j8facbJ5/xv2IRGOBpQn4thL/pQY S1fxrlzI0e+Xs7MM8Gx7oKdd53KSVec= X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=FIqOVOos c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=6ae9c975 cx=c_pps a=bLidbwmWQ0KltjZqbj+ezA==:117 a=bLidbwmWQ0KltjZqbj+ezA==:17 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=zJRp6_cAMcgA:10 a=VkNPw1HP01LnGYTKEx00:22 a=RnoormkPH1_aCDwRdu11:22 a=uAbxVGIbfxUO_5tXvNgY:22 a=14yfDfNcGX1pIiSJYtUA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1176,Hydra:6.1.138,FMLib:17.12.100.49 definitions=2026-11-03_02,2026-11-02_03,2025-10-01_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 adultscore=0 malwarescore=0 impostorscore=0 spamscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 clxscore=1015 priorityscore=1501 phishscore=0 classifier=typeunknown authscore=0 authtc= authcc= route=outbound adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.22.0-2610300000 definitions=main-2611030046 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.9.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20261103_034622_501999_A616F7BB X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 17.59 ) X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_EF,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-26) on aws-us-west-2-korg-listserv-alma10-1 On Mon, Nov 02, 2026 at 07:34:32AM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote: > On Mon, Nov 02, 2026, Steffen Eiden wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2026 at 12:02:53PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > > Drop s390's kvm_arch_vcpu_should_kick() stub as the one and only call site > > > is wrapped with "#ifndef CONFIG_S390". > > > > In the somehow near future I'll remove those #ifdefs and use the kick > > stuff for kvm_arm64. The native s390 KVM then must at least keep an > > (unused) symbol at hand. It seems that the compiler could not optimize > > those calls away. So let's keep it there so I do not have to re-add it > > soon. > > Please read the rest of the series. kvm_arch_vcpu_should_kick() goes away > entirely. Sorry for that. This patch just jumped to my attention and I had no time yet to read the rest. Steffen