From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2543F606A31A for ; Sun, 8 Nov 2026 06:19:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=bombadil.20210309 header.b=SGg+DwtB; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=Intel header.b=EnfvlOi6 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Unsubscribe-Post:List-Owner; bh=bSKNeRhoYj51dd326u4b+S/qwJ1yJgRLl0Pp5aorhH0=; b=SGg+DwtBu58vgC3zCkYZgrTG7e ji+IU827+R+IXMGZpQyiNJvFxn8FAoqI8wLiKU5D+PbDBOISpTNN8sj6jmHeoODf665NcM5IqLOij IGbAfNFrU8q25w+Latf8iRJEaOcZUfX45E9EwSLd+oPNY9F63z0g0OWG1pIZeGmrtCQI26FQH4ahz ZDqupIDrFUlx8lQ8wNbI+Tp7QF8GyyyPJ2jVapd2rpEM5hNGPOBVphIzXCFcZeF33lyT81CTjieEL hAr0Yq3NJI4CJZXJG10WYksrl5BMqN/EqFBeSnirzOSaYn2t7YYRO2GLpRxI4AMBGkRcevbvig7dL mXczdBFQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.100.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1xPwFL-0000000Fhyk-13pb; Sun, 08 Nov 2026 06:19:19 +0000 Received: from mgamail.intel.com ([192.198.163.10]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.100.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1xPwFI-0000000FhyP-1ATZ for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Sun, 08 Nov 2026 06:19:17 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1794118756; x=1825654756; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=pLWtdzulAJWXAefk0jF40+RB4tS7wf4qyhp071KtEyw=; b=EnfvlOi6WKms+1JMjugYx47Ek9PFqlC+Yu+KI+XFxSIb6xmXuru07AVJ Lwav+Gje/okQMQcUORrQ7lyWZUhi615/pf+T+wn8wokc329iAqTqfwgmo 0GuTOlU/I0GRW7pLZEWPD/PBk68JaUau1Uy8zdCnIsBqWviSzT76mCnzv uZNnDMQx4z+ABIcgXP+CNg5hWPBhodBcYRZydxvmJxH8RJKqYdAa1iGfV dTuUbUwNyWiZAwN+Qj28ix/xL+yYXsLeQgtNpvPdTphRY3+QEJ42taCxI r7A+37BWNbtgsevdxFjtv5tOnd2BsrI1CqitW6avLSRyZ9uwqhhqXrFiw Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: FS5iJFakRoeYdYT1DI5BjA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: PfxjYP15Tm29GmrJWEo40A== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11959"; a="2779946" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.27,200,1787036400"; d="scan'208";a="2779946" Received: from fmviesa005.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.145]) by fmvoesa104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Nov 2026 22:19:13 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: f4exIxHnQQ2lp12beg0EPg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 38M9y+PyQvqsqXa8cqYT4Q== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.27,200,1787036400"; d="scan'208";a="7738434" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 0caa9d2d175c) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa005.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 07 Nov 2026 22:19:10 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 0caa9d2d175c with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1xPwF9-00000000sGZ-0Dno; Sun, 08 Nov 2026 06:19:07 +0000 Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2026 14:18:39 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Tim Michals , Jassi Brar , Bjorn Andersson , Mathieu Poirier , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Chen-Yu Tsai , Jernej Skrabec , Samuel Holland Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tim Michals Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/7] remoteproc: sunxi: Add KUnit tests Message-ID: <202611081401.aakRznh0-lkp@intel.com> References: <20261101185735.762559-8-tcmichals@gmail.com> X-Archived-By: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20261101185735.762559-8-tcmichals@gmail.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.9.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20261107_221916_367257_344E547F X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.34 ) X-Spam-Score: -4.4 (----) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-26) on aws-us-west-2-korg-listserv-alma10-1 Hi Tim, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on 7649ba73f9e7e1e04d0b46213e39c79ae09dd55c] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Tim-Michals/dt-bindings-mailbox-Add-Allwinner-A523-message-box/20261101-125729 base: 7649ba73f9e7e1e04d0b46213e39c79ae09dd55c patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20261101185735.762559-8-tcmichals%40gmail.com patch subject: [PATCH v3 7/7] remoteproc: sunxi: Add KUnit tests config: s390-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20261108/202611081401.aakRznh0-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 24.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project fc9576e3b179738d99c5babe5cd9d6c1f883e0db) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20261108/202611081401.aakRznh0-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202611081401.aakRznh0-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): >> drivers/remoteproc/sunxi_rproc_kunit.c:962:58: error: no member named 'usage_count' in 'struct dev_pm_info' 962 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, atomic_read(&ctx->priv.dev->power.usage_count), 0); | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/kunit/test.h:1034:28: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ' 1034 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, left, right, NULL) | ^~~~ include/kunit/test.h:1039:8: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG' 1039 | left, ==, right, \ | ^~~~ include/kunit/test.h:874:9: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_INT_ASSERTION' 874 | left, op, right, \ | ^~~~ include/kunit/test.h:840:15: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION' 840 | const typeof(left) __left = (left); \ | ^~~~ >> drivers/remoteproc/sunxi_rproc_kunit.c:962:58: error: no member named 'usage_count' in 'struct dev_pm_info' 962 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, atomic_read(&ctx->priv.dev->power.usage_count), 0); | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/kunit/test.h:1034:28: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ' 1034 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, left, right, NULL) | ^~~~ include/kunit/test.h:1039:8: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG' 1039 | left, ==, right, \ | ^~~~ include/kunit/test.h:874:9: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_INT_ASSERTION' 874 | left, op, right, \ | ^~~~ include/kunit/test.h:840:31: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION' 840 | const typeof(left) __left = (left); \ | ^~~~ drivers/remoteproc/sunxi_rproc_kunit.c:977:58: error: no member named 'usage_count' in 'struct dev_pm_info' 977 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, atomic_read(&ctx->priv.dev->power.usage_count), 1); | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/kunit/test.h:1034:28: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ' 1034 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, left, right, NULL) | ^~~~ include/kunit/test.h:1039:8: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG' 1039 | left, ==, right, \ | ^~~~ include/kunit/test.h:874:9: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_INT_ASSERTION' 874 | left, op, right, \ | ^~~~ include/kunit/test.h:840:15: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION' 840 | const typeof(left) __left = (left); \ | ^~~~ drivers/remoteproc/sunxi_rproc_kunit.c:977:58: error: no member named 'usage_count' in 'struct dev_pm_info' 977 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, atomic_read(&ctx->priv.dev->power.usage_count), 1); | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/kunit/test.h:1034:28: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ' 1034 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, left, right, NULL) | ^~~~ include/kunit/test.h:1039:8: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG' 1039 | left, ==, right, \ | ^~~~ include/kunit/test.h:874:9: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_INT_ASSERTION' 874 | left, op, right, \ | ^~~~ include/kunit/test.h:840:31: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION' 840 | const typeof(left) __left = (left); \ | ^~~~ drivers/remoteproc/sunxi_rproc_kunit.c:1107:48: error: no member named 'usage_count' in 'struct dev_pm_info' 1107 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, atomic_read(&dev->power.usage_count), 0); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/kunit/test.h:1034:28: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ' 1034 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, left, right, NULL) | ^~~~ include/kunit/test.h:1039:8: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG' 1039 | left, ==, right, \ | ^~~~ include/kunit/test.h:874:9: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_INT_ASSERTION' 874 | left, op, right, \ | ^~~~ include/kunit/test.h:840:15: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION' 840 | const typeof(left) __left = (left); \ | ^~~~ drivers/remoteproc/sunxi_rproc_kunit.c:1107:48: error: no member named 'usage_count' in 'struct dev_pm_info' 1107 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, atomic_read(&dev->power.usage_count), 0); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/kunit/test.h:1034:28: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ' 1034 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, left, right, NULL) | ^~~~ include/kunit/test.h:1039:8: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG' 1039 | left, ==, right, \ | ^~~~ include/kunit/test.h:874:9: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_INT_ASSERTION' 874 | left, op, right, \ | ^~~~ include/kunit/test.h:840:31: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION' 840 | const typeof(left) __left = (left); \ | ^~~~ 6 errors generated. vim +962 drivers/remoteproc/sunxi_rproc_kunit.c 949 950 /* Everything as before prepare(): resets asserted, clocks off, no PM reference */ 951 static void expect_powered_off(struct kunit *test, struct test_context *ctx, 952 struct mock_providers *mp, bool core_held) 953 { 954 int i; 955 956 KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, mp->asserted[RST_CFG]); 957 KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, mp->asserted[RST_SRAM]); 958 KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, mp->asserted[RST_DEBUG]); 959 KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, mp->asserted[RST_CORE], core_held); 960 for (i = 0; i < NR_CLK; i++) 961 KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE_MSG(test, clk_hw_is_prepared(&mp->clk[i].hw), "clock %d", i); > 962 KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, atomic_read(&ctx->priv.dev->power.usage_count), 0); 963 } 964 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki