From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>
To: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@arm.com>, Suyash Mahar <smahar@meta.com>,
Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Qi Liu <liuqi115@huawei.com>, Junhao He <hejunhao3@huawei.com>,
coresight@lists.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/10] coresight: configfs: Don't assume active until cscfg_mgr is set
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2026 17:10:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261112171043.GK9176@e132581.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261016-james-cs-multiple-per-threads-v4-1-dedf961aca0e@linaro.org>
On Fri, Oct 16, 2026 at 11:46:11AM +0100, James Clark wrote:
> +static enum cscfg_load_ops cscfg_get_state(void)
> +{
> + return cscfg_mgr ? cscfg_mgr->load_state : CSCFG_UNLOAD;
> +}
Could we check !cscfg_mgr explicitly in the three functions instead?
Using CSCFG_UNLOAD to represent both "not initialized" and
"cfg unloading" is a bit confusing.
Thanks,
Leo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-12 17:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-16 10:46 [PATCH v4 00/10] coresight: Prevent per-thread events from sharing a sink James Clark
2026-10-16 10:46 ` [PATCH v4 01/10] coresight: configfs: Don't assume active until cscfg_mgr is set James Clark
2026-10-28 10:14 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-28 13:00 ` James Clark
2026-11-12 17:10 ` Leo Yan [this message]
2026-10-16 10:46 ` [PATCH v4 02/10] coresight: etm-perf: Remove workqueue for freeing AUX data James Clark
2026-11-12 17:13 ` Leo Yan
2026-10-16 10:46 ` [PATCH v4 03/10] coresight: etm-perf: Serialize AUX topology access James Clark
2026-11-12 18:09 ` Leo Yan
2026-10-16 10:46 ` [PATCH v4 04/10] coresight: etm-perf: Reject event if building path fails James Clark
2026-10-16 10:46 ` [PATCH v4 05/10] coresight: etm-perf: Prevent sink sharing at setup time James Clark
2026-10-16 10:46 ` [PATCH v4 06/10] coresight: tmc-etr: Reflect new sharing rules in allocator James Clark
2026-10-16 10:46 ` [PATCH v4 07/10] coresight: tmc-etr: Remove sharing guards from ETR James Clark
2026-10-16 10:46 ` [PATCH v4 08/10] coresight: tmc-etf: Remove sharing guards from ETF James Clark
2026-10-16 10:46 ` [PATCH v4 09/10] coresight: etb10: Remove sharing guards from ETB10 James Clark
2026-10-16 10:46 ` [PATCH v4 10/10] coresight: ultrasoc-smb: Remove sharing guards from SMB James Clark
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261112171043.GK9176@e132581.arm.com \
--to=leo.yan@arm.com \
--cc=coresight@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hejunhao3@huawei.com \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuqi115@huawei.com \
--cc=mike.leach@arm.com \
--cc=smahar@meta.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=yeoreum.yun@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox