From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 20:28:39 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 0/6] add initial imx6q support
In-Reply-To: <1315303120-24203-1-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org>
References: <1315303120-24203-1-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <2043782.jegSLqAsTH@wuerfel>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Tuesday 06 September 2011 17:58:34 Shawn Guo wrote:
> This patch series adds the initial support for imx6q, which is a
> Cortex-A9 MPCore (4 cores) SoC.
> 
> It's based on v3.1-rc4 with the patches below applied.
> 
>  * [PATCH v2 0/5] Convert DEBUG_LL UART selection to a Kconfig choice
>    http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/129702
> 
>  * [PATCH v4 2/2] ARM: l2x0: Add OF based initialization
>    http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1164401
> 
>  * [PATCH 1/7] ARM: l2x0: add empty l2x0_of_init
>    http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/130878
> 
>  * [RFC PATCH 0/3] Yet another GIC OF binding series
>    http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.devicetree/7226
> 
> For suspend/resume support, it needs the following extra patches
> applied.
> 
>  * [PATCH v2 0/2] make reinitialization of ARM core components possible
>    http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/131356
> 
>  * [PATCH v2 0/5] CPU PM notifiers
>    http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/131212/focus=131353

Hi Shawn,

We've talked about it before, but I don't remember the outcome. Can you
explain (and add to the above text) a short explanation of why this is
in the mach-imx directory, rather than the mach-mx5 (which probably is
closer to mx6 than mx3 is) or a new mach-mx6?

	Arnd