From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: heiko@sntech.de (Heiko =?ISO-8859-1?Q?St=FCbner?=) Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2016 14:36:53 +0200 Subject: [RFC PATCH v1 2/6] clk: rockchip: rk3399: add SCLK_DDRCLK ID for ddrc In-Reply-To: <9d392979-0a20-ca74-9699-2440d07dddd3@rock-chips.com> References: <1464947719-6245-1-git-send-email-hl@rock-chips.com> <1464947719-6245-3-git-send-email-hl@rock-chips.com> <9d392979-0a20-ca74-9699-2440d07dddd3@rock-chips.com> Message-ID: <20637963.iQzVZfJq9f@diego> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Shawn, Am Freitag, 3. Juni 2016, 20:34:52 schrieb Shawn Lin: > How about merge it into your patch#3. see comments from Doug and me on previous version. clock-ids should always be separate patches, as we will need them in both clock and devicetree branches, so they must be in a separate branch shared between clock and dts branches. Heiko > On 2016/6/3 17:55, Lin Huang wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Lin Huang > > --- > > Changes in v1: > > - None > > > > include/dt-bindings/clock/rk3399-cru.h | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/rk3399-cru.h > > b/include/dt-bindings/clock/rk3399-cru.h index 50a44cf..8a0f0442 100644 > > --- a/include/dt-bindings/clock/rk3399-cru.h > > +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/rk3399-cru.h > > @@ -131,6 +131,7 @@ > > > > #define SCLK_DPHY_RX0_CFG 165 > > #define SCLK_RMII_SRC 166 > > #define SCLK_PCIEPHY_REF100M 167 > > > > +#define SCLK_DDRCLK 168 > > > > #define DCLK_VOP0 180 > > #define DCLK_VOP1 181