From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 526D0C48BD7 for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 08:19:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F2F320656 for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 08:19:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="n4/kDluY" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1F2F320656 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sntech.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=fEEvNsHuMa7m1pIK1UMJ8sQq73V6hoI5orh+MF560UM=; b=n4/kDluYUIc0GA 4l0YBUJt/hFh5PpiVmMKyuNUumLof1rEOhnBeZ+iti5GwjMlt9lq3YlpGxv1UO/PbyRmTJRkXxw+X pZZeyuEGt86lJwy2n/ihO5p7+ivMfBLs5cB8qHDr8osxDqksMnvcJkzdGkbCFtY6nWRmMi4UbHuO7 vbVcJPG4wRVmJ1xLJ1kKwTPcqHlVJZikkpd9lR+UXOcR94mFq1Cn/D5nuRthH8Bdb/qHw5g6NQ/h6 z1JMtn8nvEFCQlTF/jBXAX3XLrj4p7/VYt7QyV2ndmH3aedSBzTej92RLSM7j7nE50e2IIrLoyE+q Lg7vuo59oyvFcJFrhvWg==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hgPcd-00076Z-2N; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 08:19:11 +0000 Received: from gloria.sntech.de ([185.11.138.130]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hgPca-00075w-Cn; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 08:19:09 +0000 Received: from wf0413.dip.tu-dresden.de ([141.76.181.157] helo=phil.localnet) by gloria.sntech.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hgPcN-0006oO-B4; Thu, 27 Jun 2019 10:18:55 +0200 From: Heiko Stuebner To: Lee Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/6] support a new type of PMIC, including two chips(rk817 and rk809) Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 10:18:54 +0200 Message-ID: <2084806.DiqCa91xLP@phil> In-Reply-To: <20190626115251.GR21119@dell> References: <20190621103258.8154-1-tony.xie@rock-chips.com> <20190626115251.GR21119@dell> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190627_011908_585315_8BA6EB81 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.48 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, a.zummo@towertech.it, alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com, huangtao@rock-chips.com, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, Tony Xie , zhangqing@rock-chips.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, xsf@rock-chips.com, sboyd@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, broonie@kernel.org, chenjh@rock-chips.com, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Lee, Am Mittwoch, 26. Juni 2019, 13:52:51 CEST schrieb Lee Jones: > On Fri, 21 Jun 2019, Tony Xie wrote: > > > Most of functions and registers of the rk817 and rk808 are the same, > > so they can share allmost all codes. > > > > Their specifications are as follows: > > 1) The RK809 and RK809 consist of 5 DCDCs, 9 LDOs and have the same > > registers > > for these components except dcdc5. > > 2) The dcdc5 is a boost dcdc for RK817 and is a buck for RK809. > > 3) The RK817 has one switch but The Rk809 has two. > > Just tried to apply this set to a v5.2-rc1 base, but it doesn't seem > to do so cleanly. Would you be able to rebase and resend please? I took the liberty of rebasing patch 3 accordingly and sent it as reply to the original patch3 as (v10.1). The other patches did apply cleanly after that. Heiko _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel