From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: kishon@ti.com (Kishon Vijay Abraham I) Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 15:59:43 +0530 Subject: [PATCH v2 8/9] phy: Add Cadence D-PHY support In-Reply-To: <20181121101121.7rhe2hz2mnmc72cu@flea> References: <4ec9e47fb5aa9794f69a8e75a04108055094c056.1541516029.git-series.maxime.ripard@bootlin.com> <5f5bcc06-51b2-d565-56a0-083c66c1f01a@ti.com> <8536050b-40ab-1ec4-d325-e59bb3a92e73@ti.com> <20181121101121.7rhe2hz2mnmc72cu@flea> Message-ID: <20c0fd85-95f6-9849-c10b-998a1e0f527d@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Maxime, On 21/11/18 3:41 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote: > Hi Kishon, > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 11:02:34AM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >>>> +static int cdns_dphy_config_from_opts(struct phy *phy, >>>> + struct phy_configure_opts_mipi_dphy *opts, >>>> + struct cdns_dphy_cfg *cfg) >>>> +{ >>>> + struct cdns_dphy *dphy = phy_get_drvdata(phy); >>>> + unsigned int dsi_hfp_ext = 0; >>>> + int ret; >>>> + >>>> + ret = phy_mipi_dphy_config_validate(opts); >>>> + if (ret) >>>> + return ret; >>>> + >>>> + ret = cdns_dsi_get_dphy_pll_cfg(dphy, cfg, >>>> + opts, &dsi_hfp_ext); >>>> + if (ret) >>>> + return ret; >>>> + >>>> + opts->wakeup = cdns_dphy_get_wakeup_time_ns(dphy); >> >> Is the wakeup populated here used by the consumer driver? > > It's supposed to, if it can yes. But I guess right now it's not using. I'm thinking the usefulness of validate callback (only from this series point of view). Why should a consumer driver invoke validate if it doesn't intend to configure the PHY? The 3 steps required are * The consumer driver gets the default config * The consumer driver changes some of the configuration and * The consumer driver invokes phy configure callback. phy_configure anyways can validate the config before actually configuring the phy. Thanks Kishon