From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B91E4C02185 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2025 07:27:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=NuIlwQIppzZiZANUiNYhJ9syYVM/GdZezT8FryIqca8=; b=yOuOJaSAuApv9pN7UwrjMdl2EP F24+2Xyj37Yx7gZ2+/D6zEDIO9sQbfyfEa4k6fuAN83ZA5pT9fc9AFa82eEUQ5kzUEo+ffwy1s4id TjMSZ0+vxook4ENPZdbAgBrlphF+1WwIpJYVtRZ9WDMfsOgsU2XfLVr/Edc1ob7/FkS8AgK5vvtbr LXAaR1xjYm2KBqsC7RWlxO3KseTfqCNjqjIlZpqqHJD2IudyL0Yvc6mHFRN9CIWYWiGEuZa0O+rOH i9yvfirN/HSQue6tZZ4c5WbfTb9abmvxLNiP2RmxTueAFAf/qACSAyihEb53/zdcoqYhxBJmg1VOE BhAOphag==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tZmBP-00000004v9A-2Iyh; Mon, 20 Jan 2025 07:26:51 +0000 Received: from mgamail.intel.com ([198.175.65.21]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tZm9t-00000004uxZ-3ajb for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2025 07:25:19 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1737357918; x=1768893918; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=k4ykqooUPTL/roXw/fFpliH2XGWlf7OfDPK35rRh9HA=; b=gwFzZ0xGrisqzAUV46O6E6HlP5vhOaYO20xNEbsYVVJO3ioCJ0FhCfUX kBRaM8al/tHyA/n//i3XeMoisYHpozRS8KhsK2CQp0Whe1ESFtl3BvRCH m1LFbt50o/TuPb3EE8h+CLz/B+TGm31uilsGmbmd+CKsGm/p3Ec2URFWk MLHaZptVmb9sja5zeiRiM8lNHyZ6gzvFDfGKWAfUrM3eBwHpzyVUuyZKv +k5t+yKncg4eq9U+5smkt6UR1TPS5jwRw7PDfjx1q6PwqL5a+hF4xVQkw lQ0wMfDBVXC/EV/v5+TjwDpIklYX1AyujhH9WRNo+F7D7Yn2NJVHBJS7z w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: yynRHwRAQlqszJLW/zWo6Q== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 5KPpPopaQ2uyeYst810uZQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11320"; a="37601865" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.13,218,1732608000"; d="scan'208";a="37601865" Received: from orviesa009.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.149]) by orvoesa113.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Jan 2025 23:25:12 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: vyQrnkD1RKuZNocxarZucg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 4NfaGBcnSKmXfEo/7NNF7Q== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.13,218,1732608000"; d="scan'208";a="106224522" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.107.2.109]) ([10.107.2.109]) by orviesa009-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Jan 2025 23:25:02 -0800 Message-ID: <20fa0b55-405c-4b7c-8c10-1f8d71c956b9@linux.intel.com> Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 15:24:46 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v6 4/4] igc: Add launch time support to XDP ZC To: "Abdul Rahim, Faizal" , Song Yoong Siang , "David S . Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , Willem de Bruijn , Florian Bezdeka , Donald Hunter , Jonathan Corbet , Bjorn Topel , Magnus Karlsson , Maciej Fijalkowski , Jonathan Lemon , Andrew Lunn , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Jesper Dangaard Brouer , John Fastabend , Joe Damato , Stanislav Fomichev , Xuan Zhuo , Mina Almasry , Daniel Jurgens , Andrii Nakryiko , Eduard Zingerman , Mykola Lysenko , Martin KaFai Lau , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , KP Singh , Hao Luo , Jiri Olsa , Shuah Khan , Alexandre Torgue , Jose Abreu , Maxime Coquelin , Tony Nguyen , Przemek Kitszel Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, xdp-hints@xdp-project.net References: <20250116155350.555374-1-yoong.siang.song@intel.com> <20250116155350.555374-5-yoong.siang.song@intel.com> <84770113-2546-4035-8bd4-bf9cedcfb00f@linux.intel.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Choong Yong Liang In-Reply-To: <84770113-2546-4035-8bd4-bf9cedcfb00f@linux.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250119_232518_242009_F5447ABF X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 8.69 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 20/1/2025 2:25 pm, Abdul Rahim, Faizal wrote: > > To be cautious, could we perform a stress test by sending a higher number > of packets with launch time? For example, we could send 200 packets, each > configured with a launch time, and verify that the driver continues to > function correctly afterward. > I agree on this point. Could you perform the same stress test on the STMMAC driver as well?