[PATCH] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: major refresh

[b.zolnierkie@samsung.com (Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz)]

Hi,

On Friday, August 01, 2014 12:14:41 PM Sachin Kamat wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 11:56 AM, Sachin Kamat <spk.linux@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Tushar Behera <trblinux@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 1:58 AM, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> >>>> On Tuesday 22 July 2014 11:01:10 Olof Johansson wrote:
> >>>>> This is a major refresh of the multi_v7_defconfig:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> - Bring over a bunch of Samsung drivers to make ODROID-U3 and Chromebooks usable
> >>>>>  * Enable big.LITTLE
> >>>>>  * MCPM
> >>>>>  * CYAPA touchpad
> >>>>>  * Samsung-related MTD/regulator/clk/pinmux drivers
> >>>>>  * Add some of the CrOS EC drivers
> >>>>> - Turn on TPM, HW_RANDOM
> >>>>> - OMAP_USB3 -> TI_PIPE3 option rename
> >>>>> - Enable MCPM/b.L for VEXPRESS
> >>>>> - Add new CONFIG_MTD_SPI_NOR since it otherwise masks off SPI NOR drivers
> >>>>> - CONFIG_LOGO, because penguins.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I took care to keep the new options that have been added for whose the
> >>>>> drivers are not yet in our for-next branch. This was pretty awkward so
> >>>>> we should sort out how to handle those better in the future.
> >>>>
> >>>> Since you've already done all those, how about enabling THUMB2_KERNEL?
> >>>> For the multi_v7_defconfig, it should actually give some benefits,
> >>>> since it's rather large, and it would be good to have some more testing
> >>>> with this option enabled.
> >>>>
> >>>> I guess the first step would be to enable it and just see if your
> >>>> boot farm survives the change.
> >>>
> >>> Good point, I'll definitely give that a go once the current issues are resolved.
> >>>
> >>> Which are: These changes make 5250-based machines (snow and arndale)
> >>> break. Lots of i2c timeouts on SATA and hdmi-phy. Looks like arndale
> >>> might be missing pinctrl setups for it?
> >
> > i2c timeout issue should have been fixed with the following patch:
> > i2c: i2c-s3c2410: Drop class based scanning to improve bootup time
> > (commit id: 6031d3dfc73b49bede540872e51a70ee0b6786d4) which is
> > available on Wolfram's I2C tree (should be part of linux-next too). Also
> > I do not see I2C_S3C2410 enabled in the config.
> > I do not have access to h/w today. I can verify and check tomorrow or
> > somebody could test it in the meantime with the above suggestions?
> 
> Olof,
> Tested your multi_v7_defconfig patch on top of latest linux-next (20140731).
> I did not see any aforementioned i2c issues on 5250 based Snow board. It
> booted fine. However on 5250 based Arndale board, the boot stops at
> the following:
> 
> [    1.951863] ehci_hcd: USB 2.0 'Enhanced' Host Controller (EHCI) Driver
> [    1.956937] ehci-pci: EHCI PCI platform driver
> [    1.961392] ehci-exynos: EHCI EXYNOS driver
> [    1.965698] exynos-ehci 12110000.usb: EHCI Host Controller
> [    1.971007] exynos-ehci 12110000.usb: new USB bus registered,
> assigned bus number 1
> [    1.981593] exynos-ehci 12110000.usb: can't setup: -110
> [    1.985361] exynos-ehci 12110000.usb: USB bus 1 deregistered
> [    1.991001] exynos-ehci 12110000.usb: Failed to add USB HCD
> [    1.996569] exynos-ehci: probe of 12110000.usb failed with error -110
> [    2.003041] ohci_hcd: USB 1.1 'Open' Host Controller (OHCI) Driver
> [    2.009149] ohci-exynos: OHCI EXYNOS driver
> [    2.013457] exynos-ohci 12120000.usb: USB Host Controller
> [    2.018702] exynos-ohci 12120000.usb: new USB bus registered,
> assigned bus number 1
> 
> Boots well with exynos_defconfig though. Probably some conflict with
> other config options?
> 
> I couldn't find out as I am busy with some other activity.

Olof, could you please remember to update exynos_defconfig when updating
multi_v7_defconfig with Exynos related changes?  These two configs have
been getting slightly out-of-sync since introduction of multiplatform
support for Exynos arch.  It causes waste of development/testing efforts.

Kukjin, it would really be great if all Exynos users run on a common
configuration so the development/testing is done more efficiently.  Could
you please reconsider removal of exynos_defconfig?

Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics