From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: david.lanzendoerfer@o2s.ch (David =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Lanzend=F6rfer?=) Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 11:36:29 +0100 Subject: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/5] ARM: sunxi: Add driver for SD/MMC hosts found on Allwinner sunxi SoCs In-Reply-To: <52AEF060.6000405@redhat.com> References: <1387058295-20641-1-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com> <1743952.noztKtcF2Y@dizzy-6.site> <52AEF060.6000405@redhat.com> Message-ID: <2155426.QS1WdjUNS8@dizzy-6.site> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org > I think that we're miss-communicating a bit here. What I'm trying to say > is that trying to extend the dw_mmc driver to support sunxi is a bad > idea because the sunxi hardware is quite different. And that the > sunxi hardware having autostop allows the existing sunxi-mci driver to > be much simpler then the dw-mmc driver. > IOW the much simpler driver already exists and it is the sunxi-mci > driver. Ah! Ok. Now I get it. Well then. I'll try to incorporate all the changes within this endless thread until I can get together a patchset v2 I can hand in. Now that the lectures have ended for this semester I won't be too tired for straight thinking on daily basis and will be able to create such a patchset. And please excuse my contentless answers onto the last few questions but I really wasn't myself - so to say - at this time (half asleep) -david -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: