From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: Add architecture support for PCI
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 19:58:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <21596846.kVTqp7roW4@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1391453028-23191-2-git-send-email-Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>
On Monday 03 February 2014 18:43:48 Liviu Dudau wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/io.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/io.h
> index 4cc813e..ce5bad2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/io.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/io.h
> @@ -120,9 +120,13 @@ static inline u64 __raw_readq(const volatile void __iomem *addr)
> /*
> * I/O port access primitives.
> */
> +#define arch_has_dev_port() (0)
Why not?
> #define IO_SPACE_LIMIT 0xffff
You probably want to increase this a bit, to allow multiple host bridges
to have their own I/O space.
> #define PCI_IOBASE ((void __iomem *)(MODULES_VADDR - SZ_2M))
And modify this location: There is no particular reason to have the I/O space
mapped exactly 2MB below the loadable modules, as virtual address space is
essentially free.
> +#define ioport_map(port, nr) (PCI_IOBASE + ((port) & IO_SPACE_LIMIT))
> +#define ioport_unmap(addr)
inline functions?
> static inline u8 inb(unsigned long addr)
> {
> return readb(addr + PCI_IOBASE);
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pci.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pci.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..dd084a3
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pci.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
> +#ifndef __ASM_PCI_H
> +#define __ASM_PCI_H
> +#ifdef __KERNEL__
> +
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
> +
> +#include <asm/io.h>
> +#include <asm-generic/pci-bridge.h>
> +#include <asm-generic/pci-dma-compat.h>
> +
> +#define PCIBIOS_MIN_IO 0
> +#define PCIBIOS_MIN_MEM 0
PCIBIOS_MIN_IO is normally set to 0x1000, to stay out of the ISA range.
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..7b652cf
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,112 @@
None of this looks really arm64 specific, nor should it be. I think
we should try a little harder to move this as a default implementation
into common code, even if we start out by having all architectures
override it.
> +int pci_ioremap_io(unsigned int offset, phys_addr_t phys_addr)
> +{
> + BUG_ON(offset + SZ_64K - 1 > IO_SPACE_LIMIT);
> +
> + return ioremap_page_range((unsigned long)PCI_IOBASE + offset,
> + (unsigned long)PCI_IOBASE + offset + SZ_64K,
> + phys_addr,
> + __pgprot(PROT_DEVICE_nGnRE));
> +}
Not sure if we want to treat this one as architecture specific though.
It certainly won't be portable to x86, but it could be shared with
a couple of others. We may also want to redesign the interface.
I've been thinking we could make this function allocate space in the
Linux virtual I/O space aperture, and pass two resources into it
(physical I/O aperture and bus I/O range), and get the actual
io_offset as the return value, or a negative error number.
That way, you could have an arbitrary number of host bridges in the
system and each one gets a share of the virtual aperture until
it's full.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-03 18:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-03 18:43 [PATCH] [RFC] Add AArch64 support for PCI Liviu Dudau
2014-02-03 18:43 ` [PATCH] arm64: Add architecture " Liviu Dudau
2014-02-03 18:58 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2014-02-03 19:18 ` Liviu Dudau
2014-02-03 20:05 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-02-03 21:36 ` Liviu Dudau
2014-02-04 8:44 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-02-04 11:09 ` Liviu Dudau
2014-02-04 11:54 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-02-04 16:41 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-02-03 23:07 ` Rob Herring
2014-02-03 23:31 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-02-04 9:44 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-02-04 13:57 ` Rob Herring
2014-02-04 19:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-02-04 18:15 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-02-04 18:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-02-04 19:10 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-02-04 19:21 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-02-04 9:01 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-02-03 22:34 ` Andrew Murray
2014-02-04 12:29 ` Liviu Dudau
2014-02-04 13:23 ` Andrew Murray
2014-02-04 16:18 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-02-18 6:33 ` Yijing Wang
2014-02-20 14:38 ` Liviu Dudau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=21596846.kVTqp7roW4@wuerfel \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).