From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6395BC4360C for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 20:18:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37F9921D81 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 20:18:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="EMe4MENV" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 37F9921D81 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sntech.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=LhfRn29GZtTxBr4DwFr51Typ+q3SgICxjPWfG82qeYM=; b=EMe4MENVCZoObn L9iB2Fwz6+hY+iU3tjt10dPJINpvuUOQUktPE3KCzq78DW1ATRgyhfn9r1cD3f8EL+dBYm/c7q025 hXa19DHe6BklFcaF87+GrwuUFAysPUUQ86uIB4UUfzfVJQWrSqfPJ0RR9BQTGRAsIN1zhpR0mDMHl n4ntmJUEtb03XH4K+arSrWR0mshCDygwEIKqXqc8Yjtar4O+oIRk/elL3RtIhoNNet68tzjA+Cb5L 2h8LjxK/yozCglCuTOWNZyRfha9wXKxN9fhJ1ex35xVXSJzWV3HM9Tj4HHPqrhqA6IQeG62fTtgNw m90MZ9ea1/m00d307trQ==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.2 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iGU1z-0005sI-Lo; Fri, 04 Oct 2019 20:18:27 +0000 Received: from gloria.sntech.de ([185.11.138.130]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.2 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iGU1v-0005r9-K3; Fri, 04 Oct 2019 20:18:24 +0000 Received: from 94.112.246.102.static.b2b.upcbusiness.cz ([94.112.246.102] helo=phil.localnet) by gloria.sntech.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iGU1o-0006Z3-VO; Fri, 04 Oct 2019 22:18:17 +0200 From: Heiko Stuebner To: Soeren Moch Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: rockchip: fix RockPro64 sdmmc =?UTF-8?B?c2V0dGluZ3PjgJDor7fms6jmhI/vvIzpgq7ku7bnlLFsaW51eC1yb2NrY2hpcC1ib3VuY2VzK3NoYXduLmxpbj1yb2NrLWNoaXBzLmNvbUBsaXN0cy5pbmZyYWRlYWQub3Jn5Luj5Y+R44CR?= Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2019 22:18:16 +0200 Message-ID: <2162187.GalWoky0CO@phil> In-Reply-To: References: <20191003215036.15023-1-smoch@web.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20191004_131823_807603_1CED8903 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 9.73 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, Shawn Lin , Robin Murphy , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi S=F6ren, Am Freitag, 4. Oktober 2019, 22:15:45 CEST schrieb Soeren Moch: > Heiko, > = > since you started to apply the first 2 Patches of this series (thanks > for that!), now after all the discussions here (and the heads-up for the > implemented mode detection) I think we should leave the vcc_sdio > regulator settings unmodified. I was composing a mail about me holding off on this patch due to the ongoing discussion when your mail came ;-) > It still could make sense to remove the cap-mmc-highspeed property. Are > you OK with a V2 patch for that? Sure, go ahead. Heiko _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel