From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: f.fainelli@gmail.com (Florian Fainelli) Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 20:11:50 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v4 1/3] ARM: bcm281xx: Add GPIO driver In-Reply-To: References: <1376938761-13657-1-git-send-email-markus.mayer@linaro.org> <17431632.gcbUH2MqH0@lenovo> Message-ID: <2184179.Dja4tiYGvP@lenovo> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Le lundi 19 ao?t 2013 12:05:55 Markus Mayer a ?crit : > On 19 August 2013 12:02, Florian Fainelli wrote: > > Hello Markus, > > > > Le lundi 19 ao?t 2013 11:59:19 Markus Mayer a ?crit : > >> From: Markus Mayer > >> > >> This patch adds the GPIO driver for the bcm281xx family of chips. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Markus Mayer > >> Reviewed-by: Christian Daudt > >> Reviewed-by: Tim Kryger > >> Reviewed-by: Matt Porter > >> --- > >> > >> .../devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-bcm-kona.txt | 43 ++ > > > > Since the vendor prefix has been changed from brcm to bcm, should that > > also be reflected in the Device Tree binding documentation file? > > Actually, it is the other way around. "brcm," was there first, but we > overlooked that and started upstreaming code with the "bcm," vendor > prefix. There are various patches floating around out there to change > our use of "bcm," to "brcm," to make it conform to the established > vendor prefixes. Ermm yes, I realized that after hitting send. Netherless, should this be renamed to "gpio-brcm-kona.txt" directly such that the patches you mention do not have to get updated to patch this one too? -- Florian