From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: rjw@rjwysocki.net (Rafael J. Wysocki) Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 23:17:51 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v6 0/2] cpufreq: opp: Add device tree based lookup of boost mode frequency In-Reply-To: References: <1401440477-4328-1-git-send-email-thomas.ab@samsung.com> <1430270.VsBiDfiUL9@vostro.rjw.lan> Message-ID: <2191015.UTZ3UUDTTl@vostro.rjw.lan> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Friday, May 30, 2014 11:37:58 PM Thomas Abraham wrote: > On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 8:17 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Friday, May 30, 2014 02:19:06 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >> On Friday, May 30, 2014 02:31:15 PM Thomas Abraham wrote: > >> > Changes since v5: > >> > - Fixes for checkpatch warnings with --strict option as suggested by > >> > Nishanth Menon. > >> > > >> > Changes since v4: > >> > - Code improvements suggested by Viresh Kumar. > >> > > >> > Changes since v3: > >> > - Minor changes as suggested in the last version. > >> > > >> > Changes since v2: > >> > - Reworked based on the "PM / OPP: move cpufreq specific helpers out of OPP > >> > layer" patch series posted by Nishanth Menon. > >> > > >> > Changes since v1: > >> > - Boost mode frequencies are specfied as a set of frequencies instead of > >> > specifying them as OPPs. Thanks to Nishanth, Lukasz and Rob for the > >> > feedback. > >> > > >> > This series has been acked by authors and maintainers of the code > >> > portions changed in this series. The new DT binding introduced in this > >> > patch needs an ack from device tree binding maintainers as well. > >> > > >> > Commit 6f19efc0 ("cpufreq: Add boost frequency support in core") adds > >> > support for CPU boost mode for CPUfreq drivers. To use the new boost > >> > mode, CPUfreq drivers have to specify the boost mode frequency and > >> > voltage within the CPUfreq driver, which is the case for Exynos4x12 > >> > CPUfreq driver. > >> > > >> > But for CPUfreq drivers which obtain the OPPs from cpus node, this > >> > patch series adds support to specify boost mode frequencies in the > >> > cpu device tree node. This requirement came up when Lukasz pointed > >> > out the regression caused by the Exynos CPUfreq driver consolidation > >> > patches. > >> > >> Both patches queued up for 3.16 in the linux-pm tree. > > > > But please address the Mark's comments or I'll drop them. > > Hi Rafael, > > Please drop this series for now. Both the patches have to reworked > based on Mark's comments. OK, dropped. Thanks! -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.