From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
To: ulf.hansson@linaro.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
lpieralisi@kernel.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] firmware: smccc: Stub out get_conduit()
Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 20:36:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2195785.VLH7GnMWUR@phil> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ab0476382e3342161beda94a45ddadb49b026dcd.1747760015.git.robin.murphy@arm.com>
Am Dienstag, 20. Mai 2025, 19:10:16 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit schrieb Robin Murphy:
> Various callers use arm_smccc_1_1_get_conduit() to guard their
> arm_smccc_smc() calls - since the latter is already stubbed out to
> support optional usage in !HAVE_ARM_SMCCC configs, do the equivalent
> for the former as well to make life easier.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Way nicer than to require arm32 rockchip platforms to
enable smcc stuff, even if not in use.
> ---
> include/linux/arm-smccc.h | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/arm-smccc.h b/include/linux/arm-smccc.h
> index a3863da1510e..97dc4d47c664 100644
> --- a/include/linux/arm-smccc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/arm-smccc.h
> @@ -315,7 +315,14 @@ enum arm_smccc_conduit {
> *
> * When SMCCCv1.1 is not present, returns SMCCC_CONDUIT_NONE.
> */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARM_SMCCC_DISCOVERY
> enum arm_smccc_conduit arm_smccc_1_1_get_conduit(void);
> +#else
> +static inline enum arm_smccc_conduit arm_smccc_1_1_get_conduit(void)
> +{
> + return SMCCC_CONDUIT_NONE;
> +}
> +#endif
>
> /**
> * arm_smccc_get_version()
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-20 18:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-20 17:10 [PATCH 1/2] firmware: smccc: Stub out get_conduit() Robin Murphy
2025-05-20 17:10 ` [PATCH 2/2] pmdomain: rockchip: Relax SMCCC dependency Robin Murphy
2025-05-20 18:38 ` Heiko Stuebner
2025-05-21 11:41 ` Ulf Hansson
2025-05-21 11:57 ` Robin Murphy
2025-05-21 5:07 ` Urja
2025-05-20 18:36 ` Heiko Stuebner [this message]
2025-05-21 11:28 ` [PATCH 1/2] firmware: smccc: Stub out get_conduit() Ulf Hansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2195785.VLH7GnMWUR@phil \
--to=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox