From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com (Laurent Pinchart) Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 16:52:10 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] [media] staging: allow omap4iss to be modular In-Reply-To: <20140611144754.GA17845@atomide.com> References: <5192928.MkINji4uKU@wuerfel> <20140611144754.GA17845@atomide.com> Message-ID: <2207210.T6NoNSQSCo@avalon> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Tony, On Wednesday 11 June 2014 07:47:54 Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Arnd Bergmann [140611 07:37]: > > The OMAP4 camera support depends on I2C and VIDEO_V4L2, both > > of which can be loadable modules. This causes build failures > > if we want the camera driver to be built-in. > > That's good news, but let's not fix it this way. > > > This can be solved by turning the option into "tristate", > > which unfortunately causes another problem, because the > > driver incorrectly calls a platform-internal interface > > for omap4_ctrl_pad_readl/omap4_ctrl_pad_writel. > > To work around that, we can export those symbols, but > > that isn't really the correct solution, as we should not > > have dependencies on platform code this way. > > > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann > > --- > > This is one of just two patches we currently need to get > > 'make allmodconfig' to build again on ARM. > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.c > > index 751f354..05d2d98 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.c > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.c > > @@ -190,11 +190,13 @@ u32 omap4_ctrl_pad_readl(u16 offset) > > { > > return readl_relaxed(OMAP4_CTRL_PAD_REGADDR(offset)); > > } > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(omap4_ctrl_pad_readl); > > > > void omap4_ctrl_pad_writel(u32 val, u16 offset) > > { > > writel_relaxed(val, OMAP4_CTRL_PAD_REGADDR(offset)); > > } > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(omap4_ctrl_pad_writel); > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3 > > Exporting these will likely cause immediate misuse in other > drivers all over the place. > > These should just use either pinctrl-single.c instead for muxing. > Or if they are not mux registers, we do have the syscon mapping > available in omap4.dtsi that pbias-regulator.c is already using. > > Laurent, got any better ideas? The ISS driver needs to write a single register, which contains several independent fields. They thus need to be controlled by a single driver. Some of them might be considered to be related to pinmuxing (although I disagree on that), others are certainly not about muxing (there are clock gate bits for instance). Using the syscon mapping seems like the best option. I'll give it a try. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart