From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB59DC433EF for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 09:18:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A17260F70 for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 09:18:35 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 7A17260F70 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From: References:CC:To:Subject:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=eVrGgmPee08NY3qnUvHa+xWcBP7+IOpNaM5mhD0ngd4=; b=InZj3JLVt4HNI4O0H9W8Gr4INN bCs4QKdKsbDnDlv6m49PesMiNKpkddsn80DNd/TYb3P4N+KU8V2oiEu9r3C7GN/aY4XK84Diu4BtW EZT+Iq+8nsmRsLa8kcbyxzL/4a0eUH9jiajZ/fLcD+IDDLL8PEwrCkcOXQl3MS7uAiKakDoAWKTgg l+5o0ZIcsngmYi5CR91zcdbFNxXMEZV4sg4A+A9GhCBC28qoR8MqWEyD7aTOdc2A7GzbbMwC+ZwVe Wwu0zBoTUh0bl0MYqNi/KlxtTsrFXbqFTJZsKhv9+p6NQ0klm9YfztFgRfrjo1ru8ZtplXxfNWxIq EFu3UUtA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mbJKT-006D5s-9K; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 09:16:42 +0000 Received: from szxga03-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.189]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mbIyT-0066hx-7a for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 08:53:59 +0000 Received: from dggemv711-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.53]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4HW0Qh4lQ2z8tgb; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 16:52:44 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpemm500002.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.229) by dggemv711-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.198.66) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.8; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 16:53:53 +0800 Received: from [10.174.178.247] (10.174.178.247) by dggpemm500002.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.229) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.8; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 16:53:52 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi: arm64: fix section mismatch warning To: Lorenzo Pieralisi CC: Arnd Bergmann , Sudeep Holla , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , "Arnd Bergmann" , Catalin Marinas , "Marc Zyngier" , , , References: <20210927141921.1760209-1-arnd@kernel.org> <988fa24c-76d2-1c9d-9761-b356efb0576c@huawei.com> <20211013090254.GA9901@lpieralisi> From: Hanjun Guo Message-ID: <220f6cfb-80b1-44db-ce1d-462af5dbf74e@huawei.com> Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 16:53:52 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20211013090254.GA9901@lpieralisi> Content-Language: en-GB X-Originating-IP: [10.174.178.247] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.181) To dggpemm500002.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.229) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20211015_015357_520411_77CAAE5D X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.73 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 2021/10/13 17:02, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 03:03:29PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote: >> Hi Arnd, >> >> On 2021/9/27 22:19, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >>> From: Arnd Bergmann >>> >>> In a gcc-11 randconfig build I came across this warning: >>> >>> WARNING: modpost: vmlinux.o(.text.unlikely+0x2c084): Section mismatch in reference from the function next_platform_timer() to the variable .init.data:acpi_gtdt_desc >>> The function next_platform_timer() references >>> the variable __initdata acpi_gtdt_desc. >>> This is often because next_platform_timer lacks a __initdata >>> annotation or the annotation of acpi_gtdt_desc is wrong. >>> >>> This happens when next_platform_timer() fails to get inlined >>> despite the inline annotation. Adding '__init' solves the issue, >>> and it seems best to remove the 'inline' in the process seems >>> better anyway. >> >> There was a patch to fix this issue as well [1], >> but not merged yet. >> >> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/7f29a149-e005-f13f-2cc4-a9eb737107e1@huawei.com/T/ > > My bad, we did not coordinate well - I noticed your Acked-by but as a > rule we should also CC LAKML and Catalin/Will (if they aren't CCed) on > the reply to make sure they can actually see it. It's my bad. I will make sure LAKML and Catalin/Will are CCed next time when I reply the email. Thanks Hanjun _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel