From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: tomasz.figa@gmail.com (Tomasz Figa)
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 01:32:07 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] pinctrl: samsung: Allow grouping multiple pinmux/pinconf
 nodes
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdZHUfZinS20OFm+DkziiACxDOvJNhDMvdw3LdDbau1tCA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1384881034-10520-1-git-send-email-t.figa@samsung.com>
 <7242109.um7KlGhuI2@amdc1227>
 <CACRpkdZHUfZinS20OFm+DkziiACxDOvJNhDMvdw3LdDbau1tCA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <2242006.0l244SkK9j@flatron>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Monday 25 of November 2013 15:46:12 Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com> wrote:
> > Stephen:
> >> Is the lifetime of the string "returned" by
> >> of_property_read_string_index() really so short that you must copy the
> >> string? I'd be tempted just to store the pointer, although perhaps you
> >> need to get() the node so that's safe.
> >
> > Right. I have done it the copy-less way in other places, but missed this
> > one. Thanks.
> 
> So I guess I'm waiting for a new version of this patch, right?

Right.

Best regards,
Tomasz