From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 10:05:08 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: dts: re-fromat AT91 part to match other entries In-Reply-To: <20150113234759.GH3843@piout.net> References: <20150112224203.GL22090@quad.lixom.net> <20150113230956.GA15087@quad.lixom.net> <20150113234759.GH3843@piout.net> Message-ID: <2263559.r5MiMeqJt6@wuerfel> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wednesday 14 January 2015 00:47:59 Alexandre Belloni wrote: > > On 13/01/2015 at 15:09:56 -0800, Olof Johansson wrote : > > On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 03:43:00PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > > > The entries are separated as ARM V4/V5 and ARM V7 as some other per-SoC config > > > options may be removed in the near future. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre > > > --- > > > Hi Olof, > > > > > > This is an attempt to match other ARM SoC families format. > > > If you feel that the patch can be good, do not hesitate to take it yourself. I > > > don't plan to integrate it in any of my pull-request so it can appear quickly in > > > arm-soc and can be used by everyone. > > > > Hi, > > > > If you see what Peter did, he split up the rules per-SoC based on how > > things were selectable in Kconfig. Since you seem to have the Kconfig > > entries already, how about doing the same? That way the same information > > w.r.t. SoC family that you have as comments isn't lost either. > > > > You didn't see the patch set yet because it depends on a lot of other > series still being discussed but after the switch to multiplatform, the > only config option left will be SOC_AT91RM9200, SOC_AT91SAM9 (both > under SOC_SAM_V4_V5) and SOC_SAMA5, under SOC_SAM_V7. > > That's our plan, unless you feel that we should keep one config option > per SoC. With the patches that I prepared last year, all of AT91SAM9 becomes one small file, so there really isn't any need to have separate Kconfig options. Arnd