From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 23:24:33 +0100
Subject: [RFC v1 PATCH 1/2] of/pci: add of_pci_dma_configure() update dma
 configuration
In-Reply-To: <54988FDB.8000108@ti.com>
References: <1418940425-2017-1-git-send-email-m-karicheri2@ti.com>
 <11285984.OK9CqQGmjZ@wuerfel> <54988FDB.8000108@ti.com>
Message-ID: <2285493.QXo0OxClZ5@wuerfel>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Monday 22 December 2014 16:40:43 Murali Karicheri wrote:
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> >> @@ -2052,9 +2052,10 @@ void arch_setup_dma_ops(struct device *dev, u64
> >> dma_base, u64 size,
> >>                           struct iommu_ops *iommu, bool coherent)
> >>    {
> >>           struct dma_map_ops *dma_ops;
> >> +       u64 temp_size = min((*(dev->dma_mask) + 1), size);
> >>
> >>           dev->archdata.dma_coherent = coherent;
> >> -       if (arm_setup_iommu_dma_ops(dev, dma_base, size, iommu))
> >> +       if (arm_setup_iommu_dma_ops(dev, dma_base, temp_size, iommu))
> >>
> >> If you agree, I will post v1 of the patch with these updates. Let me
> >> know. I did some basic tests on Keystone with these changes and it works
> >> fine.
> >
> > It's not exactly what I meant. My main point was that we need to limit
> > dev->dma_mask to (size-1) here, but you are not touching that.
> 
> if you mean overriding the dev->dma_mask to min((*dev->dma_mask), 
> size-1), then I am getting the error "Coherent DMA mask 0x7fffffff (pfn 
> 0x780000-0x800000) covers a smaller range of system memory than the DMA 
> zone pfn 0x0-0x880000) when the devices on Keystone tries to set the dma 
> mask. Something wrong and I need to look into the code.

Right, it sounds like the offset was applied incorrectly at some point.

What are the DMA zone size and the phys-offset?

	Arnd