From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com (Jarkko Nikula)
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 09:04:48 +0300
Subject: [RFC PATCH spi] spi: pxa2xx: pxa2xx_spi_transfer_one() can be
 static
In-Reply-To: <20180417195323.GA69680@ivb43>
References: <201804180300.Pn9JAJQ2%fengguang.wu@intel.com>
 <20180417195323.GA69680@ivb43>
Message-ID: <22cf611b-6a88-ec72-bb3c-51f8b62a8019@linux.intel.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 04/17/18 22:53, kbuild test robot wrote:
> 
> Fixes: d5898e19c0d7 ("spi: pxa2xx: Use core message processing loop")
> Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
> ---
>   spi-pxa2xx.c |    6 +++---
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-pxa2xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-pxa2xx.c
> index c852ea5..40f1346 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-pxa2xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-pxa2xx.c
> @@ -911,9 +911,9 @@ static bool pxa2xx_spi_can_dma(struct spi_controller *master,
>   	       xfer->len >= chip->dma_burst_size;
>   }
>   
> -int pxa2xx_spi_transfer_one(struct spi_controller *master,
> -			    struct spi_device *spi,
> -			    struct spi_transfer *transfer)
> +static int pxa2xx_spi_transfer_one(struct spi_controller *master,
> +				   struct spi_device *spi,
> +				   struct spi_transfer *transfer)

Thanks Fengguang. I don't understand how I managed to drop "static" 
while doing manual s/pump_transfers/pxa2xx_spi_transfer_one/ :-)

Reviewed-by: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>