From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tomasz.figa@gmail.com (Tomasz Figa) Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 10:34:07 +0100 Subject: [PATCH RFC 1/4] phy: Add new Exynos5 USB 3.0 PHY driver In-Reply-To: References: <1383205544-32244-1-git-send-email-gautam.vivek@samsung.com> <52779D28.9000905@ti.com> Message-ID: <230638605.rENrU3ufJZ@flatron> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tuesday 05 of November 2013 12:50:18 Vivek Gautam wrote: > Hi Kishon, > > On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 6:42 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Monday 04 November 2013 03:45 PM, Kamil Debski wrote: > >> Hi Kishon, > >> > >>> From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I [mailto:kishon at ti.com] > >>> Sent: Monday, November 04, 2013 7:55 AM > >>> > >>> Hi Vivek, > >>> > >>> On Thursday 31 October 2013 01:15 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote: > >>>> Add a new driver for the USB 3.0 PHY on Exynos5 series of SoCs. > >>>> The new driver uses the generic PHY framework and will interact > >>>> with > >>>> DWC3 controller present on Exynos5 series of SoCs. > >>> > >>> In Exynos, you have a single IP that supports both USB3 and USB2 PHY > >>> right? I think that needs to be mentioned here. > >> > >> As far as I know the IP is different. > > > > Ok. Sometime back Vivek was mentioning about a single IP for both USB3 > > and USB2. Thought it should be this driver. Anyway thanks for the > > clarification. > Right Kishon, I had mentioned that Exynos5's dwc3 controller have a > single IP for USB2 and USB3 phy. > From what i see, on exynos5 systems the dwc3 controller uses a combo > of usb 2 (utmi+) and usb 3 (pipe 3) phy > (with base address starting 0x12100000). I meant there is a single PHY used with the USB 3.0 controller (dwc3) and it is different from the PHY used with the USB 2.0 controller (s3c-hsotg aka dwc2). The USB 3.0 PHY and controller blocks also support USB 2.0 operation, though. So we were both right. ;) Best regards, Tomasz