From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: dma_alloc_coherent versus streaming DMA, neither works satisfactory
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 15:54:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2309938.la6bU0Xy8o@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55423317.7000401@topic.nl>
On Thursday 30 April 2015 15:50:15 Mike Looijmans wrote:
>
> Just to give you a status update, I tried that too (by adding a
> dma_mmap_coherent variant that omits the "prot" change, and some printks to
> verify that it actually does as expected).
>
> Current status is that the ACP behaves exactly like the HP port, which it
> should not do. If I send data from logic via the ACP port through the L2
> cache, using a version of dma_sync that just invalidates the cache could
> (should?) result in data corruption. Instead, the data gets corrupted only if
> you do not invalidate the line. This is what the (non-coherent) HP port
> behaves like, as it writes directly to DDR.
>
> Currently I'm assuming that the tools did something wrong in the bitstream,
> for example, wiring the "AWCACHE" and similar signals on the ACP to logic "0"
> instead of "1" while claiming to have wired them to "1" in the UI. A bug like
> that would also explain the behaviour I'm seeing now.
>
> I'll let you know once I find out more.
>
>
Ok, maybe you have to configure the SCU to include the ACP in the
cache coherency? That might not be done by default. I don't really
know anything about the SCU or the ACP, so I'm just taking wild
guesses here.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-30 13:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-23 11:52 dma_alloc_coherent versus streaming DMA, neither works satisfactory Mike Looijmans
2015-04-23 12:32 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-04-23 13:05 ` Mike Looijmans
2015-04-29 8:47 ` Mike Looijmans
2015-04-29 9:01 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-04-29 9:17 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-04-29 9:47 ` Mike Looijmans
2015-04-29 10:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-04-29 10:33 ` Mike Looijmans
2015-04-29 10:41 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-04-29 12:49 ` Mike Looijmans
2015-04-29 13:13 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-04-30 13:50 ` Mike Looijmans
2015-04-30 13:54 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2015-05-01 6:08 ` Mike Looijmans
2015-05-01 7:01 ` Mike Looijmans
2015-05-07 11:18 ` Mike Looijmans
2015-05-07 11:56 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-07 13:21 ` Daniel Drake
2015-05-07 13:31 ` Mike Looijmans
2015-05-07 14:08 ` Mike Looijmans
2015-05-07 14:30 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-05-08 5:55 ` Mike Looijmans
2015-05-08 7:54 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-08 8:31 ` Mike Looijmans
2015-05-08 13:19 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-08 14:18 ` Mike Looijmans
2015-05-08 14:27 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-08 11:10 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-05-08 12:17 ` Mike Looijmans
2015-04-29 11:09 ` Mike Looijmans
2015-04-29 12:35 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-04-29 12:52 ` Mike Looijmans
2015-04-29 12:54 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2309938.la6bU0Xy8o@wuerfel \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox