From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 19:10:03 +0100
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/7] Documentation: Add device tree bindings for
 Freescale i.MX GPC
In-Reply-To: <1392737687-25003-2-git-send-email-p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
References: <1392737687-25003-1-git-send-email-p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
 <1392737687-25003-2-git-send-email-p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
Message-ID: <2328803.HhaG6blXIR@wuerfel>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Tuesday 18 February 2014 16:34:41 Philipp Zabel wrote:
> +
> +Example of a device that is part of a power domain:
> +
> +       vpu: vpu at 02040000 {
> +               reg = <0x02040000 0x3c000>;
> +               /* ... */
> +               fsl,power-domain = <&pd_pu>;
> +               /* ... */
> +       };
> +

I'm really not too happy about platforms starting to add random
bindings for power domains. Unfortunately I didn't catch exynos
doing this first, but I don't want to see another platform like
that.

Can we please come up with a proper generic power domain binding
first and then add platform specific users?

	Arnd