From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] arm: apply more __ro_after_init
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 12:00:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2342289.4RWg0SWI3A@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160810094339.GK1041@n2100.armlinux.org.uk>
On Wednesday, August 10, 2016 10:43:39 AM CEST Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 11:40:24AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > @@ -1309,16 +1309,11 @@ void __init arm_mm_memblock_reserve(void)
> > * Any other function or debugging method which may touch any device _will_
> > * crash the kernel.
> > */
> > +static char vectors[PAGE_SIZE * 2] __ro_after_init __aligned(PAGE_SIZE);
> > static void __init devicemaps_init(const struct machine_desc *mdesc)
> > {
> > struct map_desc map;
> > unsigned long addr;
> > - void *vectors;
> > -
> > - /*
> > - * Allocate the vector page early.
> > - */
> > - vectors = early_alloc(PAGE_SIZE * 2);
>
> This one is not appropriate. We _do_ write to these pages after init
> for FIQ handler updates. See set_fiq_handler().
Is that the only thing that modifies the page? If we think this is a
valuable change, we could make it depend on the absence of FIQ
support, as very few platforms (rpc, omap1, s3c24xx and possibly
imx) seem to even use it.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-10 10:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-03 18:40 [PATCH 0/2] expand use of __ro_after_init Kees Cook
2016-06-03 18:40 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86: apply more __ro_after_init and const Kees Cook
2016-06-03 18:40 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm: apply more __ro_after_init Kees Cook
2016-06-03 18:51 ` [kernel-hardening] " Greg KH
2016-06-03 21:26 ` Kees Cook
2016-06-03 21:54 ` Greg KH
2016-06-03 22:01 ` Kees Cook
2016-08-10 9:43 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-08-10 10:00 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2016-08-10 10:12 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-08-10 19:31 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-08-10 23:02 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-08-11 16:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-08-12 11:34 ` Daniel Thompson
2016-08-10 17:06 ` [kernel-hardening] " Daniel Micay
2016-08-10 18:32 ` Kees Cook
2016-08-10 19:41 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-08-10 21:40 ` Kees Cook
2016-08-10 23:06 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-08-11 15:54 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-08-11 22:16 ` Kees Cook
2016-08-12 16:24 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2342289.4RWg0SWI3A@wuerfel \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).