From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: t.figa@samsung.com (Tomasz Figa) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 11:28:23 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 3/4] pinctrl: samsung: Add support for Exynos4x12 In-Reply-To: References: <1351089457-8205-1-git-send-email-t.figa@samsung.com> Message-ID: <2350814.8tYbDqrzVz@amdc1227> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Linus, Kyungmin, On Monday 29 of October 2012 09:30:26 Kyungmin Park wrote: > On 10/29/12, Linus Walleij wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote: > >> This patch extends the driver with any necessary SoC-specific > >> definitions to support Exynos4x12 SoCs. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa > >> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park > > > > Acked-by: Linus Walleij > > > > I guess you need all of this to go into my Samsung branch? > > I need and ACK from the Samsung maintainer and preferably > > Thomas A as well. > > Hi, > > Now we're trying to send the standalone patches to avoid the conflict. > and hope to merge patches via proper subsystem. In this case, pinctl. Since this depends on the patch adding Exynos4x12 dts files ([PATCH] ARM: dts: exynos4: Add support for Exynos4x12 SoCs), which will be going through Kgene's tree and this patch series contains mostly SoC-specific code, maybe this should rather go through Kgene's tree? Or this is not a problem? Best regards, -- Tomasz Figa Samsung Poland R&D Center SW Solution Development, Linux Platform