From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 13:25:03 +0200
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/9] mfd: AXP20x: Add mfd driver for AXP20x PMIC
In-Reply-To: <1397209093-10077-2-git-send-email-carlo@caione.org>
References: <1397209093-10077-1-git-send-email-carlo@caione.org>
 <1397209093-10077-2-git-send-email-carlo@caione.org>
Message-ID: <235623053.nj0gFkxyW5@wuerfel>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Friday 11 April 2014 11:38:05 Carlo Caione wrote:
> +#define AXP20X_IRQ(_irq, _off, _mask) \
> +       [AXP20X_IRQ_##_irq] = { .reg_offset = (_off), .mask = BIT(_mask) }
> +
> +static const struct regmap_irq axp20x_regmap_irqs[] = {
> +       AXP20X_IRQ(ACIN_OVER_V,         0, 7),
> +       AXP20X_IRQ(ACIN_PLUGIN,         0, 6),
> +       AXP20X_IRQ(ACIN_REMOVAL,        0, 5),
> +       AXP20X_IRQ(VBUS_OVER_V,         0, 4),
> +       AXP20X_IRQ(VBUS_PLUGIN,         0, 3),
> +       AXP20X_IRQ(VBUS_REMOVAL,        0, 2),
> +       AXP20X_IRQ(VBUS_V_LOW,          0, 1),
> +       AXP20X_IRQ(BATT_PLUGIN,         1, 7),
> +       AXP20X_IRQ(BATT_REMOVAL,        1, 6),
> +       AXP20X_IRQ(BATT_ENT_ACT_MODE,   1, 5),
> +       AXP20X_IRQ(BATT_EXIT_ACT_MODE,  1, 4),
> +       AXP20X_IRQ(CHARG,               1, 3),
> +       AXP20X_IRQ(CHARG_DONE,          1, 2),
> +       AXP20X_IRQ(BATT_TEMP_HIGH,      1, 1),

Why do you have to enumerate the interrupts here? Can't you just
put all the numbers into the DT nodes of the devices using them?

In general, I would say that the mfd driver should not care about
what is connected to it.

	Arnd