From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
To: ulf.hansson@linaro.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
lpieralisi@kernel.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pmdomain: rockchip: Relax SMCCC dependency
Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 20:38:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2393836.usQuhbGJ8B@phil> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6f0a38e596c0727d0de13a29c9224f71bc7d30f1.1747760015.git.robin.murphy@arm.com>
Am Dienstag, 20. Mai 2025, 19:10:17 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit schrieb Robin Murphy:
> Most 32-bit Rockchip platforms do not use PSCI, so having to select
> ARM_PSCI to satisfy a dependency chain to retain working power domain
> support is a bit weird and non-obvious. Now that the offending SMCCC API
> is properly stubbed out for optional usage, we can relax this again.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Of course this needs patch1 of this series to get applied
first.
I think for bisectability, doing this directly in patch1 might
be less dangerous though?
Heiko
> ---
> drivers/pmdomain/rockchip/Kconfig | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pmdomain/rockchip/Kconfig b/drivers/pmdomain/rockchip/Kconfig
> index 218d43186e5b..ffe5e7b78494 100644
> --- a/drivers/pmdomain/rockchip/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/pmdomain/rockchip/Kconfig
> @@ -4,7 +4,6 @@ if ARCH_ROCKCHIP || COMPILE_TEST
> config ROCKCHIP_PM_DOMAINS
> bool "Rockchip generic power domain"
> depends on PM
> - depends on HAVE_ARM_SMCCC_DISCOVERY
> depends on REGULATOR
> select PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS
> help
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-20 18:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-20 17:10 [PATCH 1/2] firmware: smccc: Stub out get_conduit() Robin Murphy
2025-05-20 17:10 ` [PATCH 2/2] pmdomain: rockchip: Relax SMCCC dependency Robin Murphy
2025-05-20 18:38 ` Heiko Stuebner [this message]
2025-05-21 11:41 ` Ulf Hansson
2025-05-21 11:57 ` Robin Murphy
2025-05-21 5:07 ` Urja
2025-05-20 18:36 ` [PATCH 1/2] firmware: smccc: Stub out get_conduit() Heiko Stuebner
2025-05-21 11:28 ` Ulf Hansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2393836.usQuhbGJ8B@phil \
--to=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).