From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: anarsoul@gmail.com (Vasily Khoruzhick) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 17:16:53 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] clk: samsung: fix several typos to fix boot on s3c2410 In-Reply-To: <53B16F1C.4040206@samsung.com> References: <1403555350-14895-1-git-send-email-anarsoul@gmail.com> <1519968.Vijxn8Mc9S@vasilykh-desktop-i5> <53B16F1C.4040206@samsung.com> Message-ID: <2414590.ONaMigMLUH@vasilykh-desktop-i5> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 30 June 2014 16:07:24 Tomasz Figa wrote: > Hi Vasily, > > On 30.06.2014 16:02, Vasily Khoruzhick wrote: > > On 30 June 2014 15:49:58 Tomasz Figa wrote: > >> On 23.06.2014 22:29, Vasily Khoruzhick wrote: > >>> There's a several typos in a driver: 2410 instead of S3C2410 > >>> and wrong argument to ARRAY_SIZE(). They prevent s3c2410 > >>> from properly booting. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Vasily Khoruzhick > >>> --- > >>> > >>> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-s3c2410.c | 4 ++-- > >>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >> > >> Applied as a fix for 3.16. > > > > Hi Tomasz, > > > > I also have clk fixes for s3c24xx touchscreen, framebuffer, adc, usb and > > nand drivers (to replace clk_enable with clk_prepare_enable and > > clk_disable with clk_disable_unprepare), > > > > Should they be merged through different trees or it's possible to merge > > them through a single tree? > > I'd say they should all go through respective subsystem trees, unless > they directly depend on patches I already applied, which is not the case > as far as I can see. Hm, they aren't necessary for compiling the kernel, but system fails to boot without these patches due to merge of common clk changes for s3c24xx. > Best regards, > Tomasz P.S. Sorry for 2nd mail, Tomasz, I've occassionally omited MLs.