From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Fri, 03 May 2013 13:20:07 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/9] ARM: tegra: Tegra114 needs CPU_FREQ_TABLE In-Reply-To: References: <1367528578-518090-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> <1367528578-518090-2-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> Message-ID: <2416484.HHc7d0zNGR@wuerfel> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Friday 03 May 2013 10:27:17 Viresh Kumar wrote: > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/Kconfig > > index 597e76b..9878503 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/Kconfig > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/Kconfig > > @@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ config ARCH_TEGRA_114_SOC > > select ARM_ARCH_TIMER > > select ARM_GIC > > select ARM_L1_CACHE_SHIFT_6 > > + select CPU_FREQ_TABLE if CPU_FREQ > > select CPU_V7 > > select PINCTRL > > select PINCTRL_TEGRA114 > > I doubt which is the best place for doing this? This one or > cpufreq/Kconfig.arm with select CPU_FREQ_TABLE for > tegra? It would be much better IMHO to have an entry for TEGRA_CPUFREQ in drivers/cpufreq/Kcofnig.arm and move the select there. However, creating that entry has some (small) regression potential and I didn't want to do that now but instead just made sure that all three Tegra SoCs do the same thing for now. Arnd